We performed a comparison between Cisco Intersight and vCloud Director based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool helps to manage Cisco servers."
"We enjoy having an inside view of all the data centers and all the EdgeX nodes within a single portal rather than going into the EdgeX connections one by one."
"Cisco Intersight has valuable features for workflow automation and inventory administration."
"The product has good integration."
"Intersight can validate our environment."
"I like Intersight because of the integration with HashiCorp, Kubernetes, and each cloud because Intersight is the IO module."
"Our organization uses Cisco Intersight since it helps manage our physical infrastructure."
"Scalable portfolio of services for remote device management, with good cloud integration. It's also easy to set up."
"vCloud Director is a scalable solution, and we have 10 customers who use it."
"The most valuable feature of vCloud Director is virtualization."
"If a customer is looking for disaster recovery at a cheaper price, this is the best solution."
"What I found most valuable in vCloud Director is the multi-tenancy."
"We can run it on self-hosted systems, and we are happy with the stability of vCloud Director."
"The most valuable features are the multi-tenancy and multi-site configuration."
"I have found the solution scales well."
"The product allows us to add or remove features."
"The solution needs some enhancement in order to build the cluster in two nodes."
"The product's setup should be easier."
"Cisco Intersight needs some improvement in terms of stability. Hybrid cloud management and proper hyperscaler tie-up are other areas for improvement."
"It's a very complex solution."
"The unique problem with Cisco Intersight is that it's not supporting some players."
"The product could be easy to use."
"In the future, the solution needs to plan on an extension to cover a broader range of objects since, at present, there are some Cisco devices within the range of Intersight UCS that it can't manage."
"The usability must be better."
"There are some shortcomings. There are bugs with opening support."
"It would be nice to see some new features in respect of the GUI."
"Lacks integration with the hyperscalers."
"The integration between components could be improved."
"The solution should add other hypervisors so things like hover wizards can be automated."
"Technical support is something that we've had problems with in the past. Across all the VMware solutions we have not always had the best response from support. To be fair a lot of the issues that came up for us have been quite niche but it seems that in terms of release cycles they introduced a lot of bugs and it's a lot of stuff that support generally has to work quite hard on. There have been cases when we've logged critical priority issues and not had responses in time. I think support is something that can be worked on."
"The product could use a billing feature so we can automate billing for clients."
"If you use it for a lot of customers, it is too heavy for this solution."
Cisco Intersight is ranked 13th in Cloud Management with 10 reviews while vCloud Director is ranked 6th in Cloud Management with 62 reviews. Cisco Intersight is rated 7.8, while vCloud Director is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Intersight writes "Scalable and easy to set up portfolio of services; good for remote device management and other functions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCloud Director writes "Offers flexibility of handling workloads and good scalability". Cisco Intersight is most compared with Cisco UCS Manager, HPE OneView, IBM Turbonomic, Cisco UCS Director and VMware Aria Operations, whereas vCloud Director is most compared with VMware Aria Automation, Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM), VMware Aria Operations, Morpheus and CloudStack. See our Cisco Intersight vs. vCloud Director report.
See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.