We performed a comparison between Cisco IOS SSL VPN and Sangfor SSL VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two SSL VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution's technical support is very good."
"Cisco VPN is easy to connect."
"The solution is very stable."
"It is very simple to use, and it allows me to get into the university's network from my home, which is very useful for me."
"With Cisco IOS SSL VPN, you can access your corporate data safely and securely."
"Cisco certainly has a really strong support team."
"The multicast feature is useful for us."
"Cisco IOS SSL VPN provides fast connectivity and the option to connect through multiple servers."
"Sangfor SSL VPN is a secure and user-friendly solution."
"The platform is easy to use."
"Sangfor SSL VPN provides secure encryption for communication."
"The most valuable feature is our ability to limit access by user, IP address, or MAC address."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of the product is very easy."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The company sets the policies for the default location, and destination, which the VPN connects. If there is a problem with one of those locations, which happens sometimes when I travel I need to have an option to select a different available location. Currently, I am unable to see that from a user's point of view."
"It would be nice if we could use this not just on mobile, but on laptops and desktops as well."
"The system needs to be upgraded to replace the Token Authentication software, which will no longer be supported."
"Cisco has a history of problems with the area of web filtering, because of which my company sometimes had to change the vendor and the appliance."
"It would be helpful if Cisco IOS SSL VPN could help us set up devices on our iPads and phones."
"The performance could be improved."
"Cisco IOS SSL VPN should add a sensor that can authenticate with a fingerprint instead of having to type the username and password every time."
"The solution does not give us options if the connectivity to one server is not available."
"Sangfor SSL VPN should provide advanced protection against ransomware and better data analysis."
"I think Sangfor can provide a web-based SSL VPN version."
"In redundancy mode, when the firewall goes off, the VPN should be able to connect to the secondary firewall automatically."
"No solution is perfect, so there is room for improvement."
"The technical support team takes around two months to respond to queries. It is very time-consuming."
Cisco IOS SSL VPN is ranked 1st in SSL VPN with 47 reviews while Sangfor SSL VPN is ranked 7th in SSL VPN with 5 reviews. Cisco IOS SSL VPN is rated 8.6, while Sangfor SSL VPN is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco IOS SSL VPN writes "The solution is very stable and scalable, but it is expensive, and the configuration is complicated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sangfor SSL VPN writes "A secure and user-friendly solution that is simple to implement and configure". Cisco IOS SSL VPN is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), Fortinet FortiClient, Zyxel VPN Client, Ivanti Connect Secure and SonicWall Netextender, whereas Sangfor SSL VPN is most compared with Sangfor EasyConnect, Peplink SpeedFusion, AWS Direct Connect and OpenVPN Access Server. See our Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs. Sangfor SSL VPN report.
See our list of best SSL VPN vendors and best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all SSL VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
