We performed a comparison between Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN and Ubiquiti WLAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"The solution is very secure."
"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"The solution is stable."
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"It makes the process much easier by providing visibility and centralized control over the network."
"For Meraki, the ease of deployment and management is most valuable."
"The management and upgrades are very simple and straightforward."
"Great architecturally based dashboard and the solution is accessible from anywhere."
"Cloud management, wireless infrastructure, and implementation are all valuable features."
"Its flexibility, ease of management via the portal, and the variety of access points are the most valuable features."
"I have found it to be stable."
"The product's cloud controller is easy to use."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The solution is scalable."
"Ubiquiti provides good connectivity for the end-user, so I think it's stable."
"would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. It is very scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the level of security on the Wi-Fi network."
"Ubiquiti WLAN is a reliable, stable, and robust solution."
"The product is simple to use in terms of GUI and dashboard."
"Ubiquiti WLAN has good availability, and it is much cheaper."
"The solution is expensive."
"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."
"The pricing is very high in the Indian market."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"The price could be better."
"The dashboard could be a bit better. I'd like to see more information about the whole controller and APs. It should be as simple and convenient."
"Currently, with Meraki, a controller is required to direct guest and user traffic to the internet. Improvement is needed in the portal for enhanced visibility into activities. Additionally, addressing multiple bugs, especially those arising with new releases, is crucial to ensure system stability."
"There should be better Spanish-language technical support."
"The signal coverage radius could be extended."
"In the future, I would like to see IP telephony in Saudi Arabia."
"In a future release, they should offer a next-generation UTM, where you can manage all items and the network, and have it include a lot of security features like fingerprinting functionality."
"Our only concern at this stage is how it's licensed."
"The logging sometimes doesn't give us the granularity needed. Some of the rules are a bit more complicated. The switch ports on the routers are not individually addressable, in the sense that with a switch you can tell what MAC address is on what port but with the security appliances, you can't, which would be beneficial for troubleshooting."
"The statistics you can get on it are a bit limited from what I have seen so far."
"When I started to upgrade, the controller for Unbuntu was really struggling to start up, however, that has since been solved."
"Ubiquiti WLAN would be improved with the addition of individual AP configuration, which would allow for fine-tuning of individual access points and logins."
"The room for improvement is in the controller levels."
"The solution is stable but could improve."
"Cloud management is one feature that should be included in the next release. This tool is best suited for small environments, not large and complex ones."
"Its scalability, UI, and security features could be better."
"The solution should support a larger bandwidth or distance between the access points and the main stations."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is ranked 4th in Wireless LAN with 115 reviews while Ubiquiti WLAN is ranked 5th in Wireless LAN with 38 reviews. Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is rated 8.2, while Ubiquiti WLAN is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN writes "Offers good mobility, stability and scalability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti WLAN writes "Helps to build VPNs but improvement is needed in stability ". Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Ubiquiti Wireless, Mist AI and Cloud and Cisco Wireless, whereas Ubiquiti WLAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Huawei Wireless and WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi. See our Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Ubiquiti WLAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
