We performed a comparison between Cisco SD-WAN and FatPipe SD-WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions."The most valuable features, application awareness, and failover resilience, stand out as key considerations for users."
"Installation is easy."
"The technical support is very responsive."
"The cloud environment, including cloud security integration, is very valuable because of the many API integrations with the SD-WAN."
"So far, the feature that I like best is the policy configuration manager."
"The solution has great scalability."
"The solution is great at aggregating the traffic and then sending it in one direction."
"You can easily scale the product."
"The most valuable feature of FatPipe SD-WAN is it's based on SD-WAN technology."
"Cisco SD-WAN is not as easy to deploy as the Meraki and FortiGate solutions. The zero-touch deployment could be a lot better. The deployment and initial setup are complicated and could be better."
"Some configurations or procedures could be more user-friendly. Adding a bandwidth management feature would make Cisco SD-WAN more scalable and less resource-intensive."
"An area for improvement lies in enhancing the integration with the security functions of the SD-WAN."
"The initial setup could be a bit less complex."
"Since most user-data is going through the solution, we are concerned about security, as all the information is in the cloud and not on-premises. The user data authentification should be higher to better prevent malicious attacks."
"The client portal needs to be improved in order to make the solution much better."
"I would like to see revision cycles to be more stable."
"The initial setup was not very straightforward, but it gets easier the more deployments you complete."
"FatPipe SD-WAN can improve the price to scale the solution."
Cisco SD-WAN is ranked 1st in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 86 reviews while FatPipe SD-WAN is ranked 16th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 1 review. Cisco SD-WAN is rated 8.0, while FatPipe SD-WAN is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco SD-WAN writes "A solution for integrating services to enhance up-time, performance and lower costs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of FatPipe SD-WAN writes "Beneficial technology, reliable, and simple deployment". Cisco SD-WAN is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Meraki SD-WAN, VMware SD-WAN, Juniper Session Smart Router and Cato SASE Cloud Platform, whereas FatPipe SD-WAN is most compared with VMware SD-WAN and Fortinet FortiGate.
See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.