We compared Cisco Umbrella and Vera Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: Cisco Umbrella is highly regarded for its seamless integration with existing infrastructure, extensive range of security features, and ability to centrally manage security. Versa Unified SASE Platform is highly regarded for its flexibility and compatibility with various hardware.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Umbrella could enhance security by adding a transferring proxy feature and improving its Linux agent for Linux-based companies. Versa Unified SASE Platform could benefit from enhancements in hardware-software integration, documentation, and SSL VPN.
Ease of Deployment: Cisco Umbrella has a simple and user-friendly initial setup that can be completed quickly in around 30 minutes. Setting up Versa Unified SASE Platform is generally considered straightforward, although a few have described the process as complex.
Service and Support: Customers have praised Cisco Umbrella's support, describing it as excellent and superior to the customer service of other vendors. Users appreciate the Versa team's knowledge and expertise, but some have expressed dissatisfaction with the time it takes to receive a response.
Pricing: The cost of Cisco Umbrella differs based on the specific needs and approach of the customer, with flexible pricing and transparent charges. It is seen as reasonable and competitive by some, but a few perceive it as costly. The setup cost for Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform is considered moderate, without any hidden expenses.
ROI: Cisco Umbrella has proven to be a valuable investment by addressing maintenance concerns, reducing expenses associated with hardware updates, and effectively thwarting threats. It offers enhanced visibility and aids in remediation efforts. Versa enhances the user experience and improves application performances and file transfers.
Comparison Results: Users appreciate Cisco Umbrella for its easy setup, extensive security features, and ability to centrally manage security, but some noted that the solution could improve its Linux agent. Versa is praised for its adaptable licensing, but users say it could improve hardware and software integration.
"The product helps to aggregate network links. The tool increases security and makes it possible for you to have remote workers."
"The solution is good to use and easy to handle and manage from the centralized location or from the cloud."
"I have found the performance and the Zero-Touch provisioning helpful which makes it easier for us to develop."
"There is minimum blind space in this solution."
"There have been no issues with stability."
"The solution is stable and reliable."
"The integration of Layer 3 and application routing is great."
"Customizing SD-WAN is very easy because you can define two colors. You can define two different operators. You can deploy a partial mesh, a full mesh, or hub-and-spoke totally differently. If you want to do this on a DMVPN solution, that's really hard."
"I like all the features. We utilize different LAN, bandwidth transferring, bandwidth balancing, and mappings. We use it as a centralized solution, and use the same product at all our locations."
"The division of Control Plane and Data Plane is most valuable. It can be deployed anywhere, and you can control it and configure it from anywhere. This is one of the good features of this solution."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the next-generation firewall features and geo-blocking capabilities."
"The initial setup is simple."
"Overall, it's nice and very user friendly. That's what makes it so successful. They give you complicated features but with a very simple user interface, and that's been a big success for them."
"The granularity when it comes to configuration and security features are valuable."
"Our customers are very satisfied with this solution. They have not mentioned any areas for improvement."
"Versa FlexVNF is a scalable product because it does not have any hardware dependencies. This makes it a versatile solution that can be easily integrated with any firewall."
More Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform Pros →
"The initial setup could be a bit less complex."
"They should enhance the reporting because, as it is today, they need more executive-level reports."
"Cisco needs to improve the technical support for this solution."
"The solution should not be so bound to ISPs."
"The solution is a bit complicated."
"Customers require features that are secure for endpoints, on-premises, and for the cloud."
"The user interface needs to be more friendly."
"Cyber security should also be implemented in the solution, along with maybe implementation of AI/ML."
"The web interface can be improved."
"The security should be improved."
"Certainly, there are areas that require enhancement, and the current focus is on improvements. Presently, I believe that the emphasis should be on enhancing user interface (UI) features, particularly over end devices. The issue arises when attempting to log in to Versa from other devices, as the UI is not device-specific. Consequently, guiding someone to log in to Versa antivirus becomes challenging. Despite the absence of issues on the website, the lack of a login scope impedes graphical representation of user data or databases. Since work databases support only a limited range of features, I recommend augmenting features for end devices to address these limitations."
"The interface could be simpler."
"The solution's current customer support is not that good. So, they need to improve that. Also, the solution's UI is quite complex, so they need to simplify it."
"Another thing that should be improved in Versa are their firewall features."
"There are limitations when you connect from multiple locations. It does not work as expected. If you have more than 400 users, then it will choke. It will not perform as expected."
"The stability of FlexVNF's controller and devices could be improved."
More Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform Cons →
More Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco SD-WAN is ranked 1st in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 86 reviews while Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform is ranked 8th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 20 reviews. Cisco SD-WAN is rated 8.0, while Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco SD-WAN writes "A solution for integrating services to enhance up-time, performance and lower costs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform writes "A flexible, stable and scalable solution ". Cisco SD-WAN is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Meraki SD-WAN, VMware SD-WAN, Juniper Session Smart Router and Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform, whereas Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, VMware SD-WAN, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Meraki SD-WAN and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange. See our Cisco SD-WAN vs. Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform report.
See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.