Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Sourcefire SNORT and Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like most of Cisco's features, like malware detection and URL filtering.""It has a huge rate of protection. It's has a low level of positives and a huge rate of threat protection. It's easy to deploy and easy to implement. It has an incredible price rate compared to similar solutions.""Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is easy to configure and the reporting is great. It's also very user-friendly.""Cisco technical support is unbeatable. It offers a premium service every time.""The URL filtering is very good and you can create a group for customized URLs.""The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet.""Solid intrusion detection and prevention that scales easily in very large environments.""The solution is stable."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Pros →

"The solution's IDS functionality filters the traffic and blocks malware by blocking the connections.""The IPS signatures and the IPS database that are given are much better than what is commonly available.""You don't need any hardware because the solution is on the cloud. I like that Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is easy to install and manage.""What I found most valuable in Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is its accuracy. It's the best IPS solution in the market.""It integrates easily.""The technical support on offer is very good.""A standout feature of TippingPoint is its strong integration with various solutions. It stands out as one of the leading network Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS) in the current market and is known for its seamless integration with other solutions. For instance, when it identifies a potential threat within the traffic stream, it meticulously analyzes the data. Even in multilayer security scenarios, Tipping Point's network IPS can serve as a bypass for the basic firewall. If a threat is identified by Tipping Point, it promptly shares this information with the other systems. This ensures that they're updated and can employ the necessary solutions from their signature databases. The entire network gets safeguarded automatically. This integration extends to components like security and FX. This linkage streamlines our operations, offering a consolidated point of control for managing threats effectively.""Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is very stable. In addition, the provider gives notice of any changes well in advance, which is important for planning updates."

More Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System Pros →

Cons
"The solution's approach to managing traffic blocking is confusing and impractical.""Integration with other components — even Cisco's own products — can be enhanced to improve administrative experience.""The customization of the rules can be simplified.""While the alerts they offer are good, it could improve it in the sense that they should be more detailed to make the alerts more useful to us in general. Sometimes the solution will offer up false positives. Due to the fact that the alerts aren't detailed, we have to go dig around to see why is it being blocked. The solution would be infinitely better if there was just a bit more detail in the alert information and logging we receive.""I did not experience any pain points that required improvement. Maybe a couple of false-positives, but that's about it.""I don't think this solution is a time-based control system, because one cannot filter traffic based on time.""The main dashboard of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT could improve.""The initial setup is a little difficult compared to other products in the market. It depends on the environment. If we are doing any migration, it might take months in a brown-field environment."

More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Cons →

"The firewall rules are limited.""Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System needs strong Spanish-language support.""It takes a lot of time before you're connected to an engineer, so an area for improvement in Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is the response time of its technical support team.""TTPS is a bit behind in visuals, the UI, and some data elements.""I find Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System a bit clunky, and updating it can be a pain in the neck because you need to do it from time to time, so this is what needs to be improved in it. I would also rather have an all-in-one system that does intrusion detection, protection, web filtering, and also serves as a firewall, and my company is moving to an all-in-one solution, but I'm unsure of how soon that's going to be. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System also doesn't have enough bandwidth to handle the required traffic within my company, so it's going to be replaced.""An area for improvement in Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is the complexity of its interface.""We need more integration. It would be good if Azure IPS and TippingPoint IPS and other products from Trend Micro like their DBI and IWSVA could talk between each other.""It integrates well but it takes time."

More Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We have a three-year license for this solution."
  • "Licensing for this solution is paid on a yearly basis."
  • "I don't know the exact amount, but most of the time when I go to a company with a proposition, they will say, "This thing that you are selling is good, but it's expensive. Why don't you propose something like FortiGate, Check Point, or Palo Alto?" Cisco device are expensive compared to other devices."
  • "The cost is per port and can be expensive but it does include training and support for three years."
  • More Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "TippingPoint is not as expensive as Palo Alto but it's not as cheap as Fortigate."
  • "It's an expensive product."
  • "Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is an expensive product."
  • "We pay for Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System yearly. The cost increases if you add more users."
  • "TTPS is reasonably priced."
  • "It is an expensive solution and I would rate it three out of ten."
  • "The price is in a market-suitable price range. So it's not expensive, but it's also not cheap either. The price is a strong point."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."
  • More Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet.
    Top Answer:The product is inexpensive compared to leading brands such as Palo Alto or Fortinet. It is cheaper than Palo Alto and comparable to Fortinet. It also depends on Cisco’s discount. Sometimes it's… more »
    Top Answer:The solution has some stability issues. Also, it's complicated compared to other products like FortiGate.
    Top Answer:The solution's IDS functionality filters the traffic and blocks malware by blocking the connections.
    Top Answer:On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten.
    Top Answer:The way we can build the filters could be improved. The solution should provide the possibility to mix traffic parameters with traffic's geographical source to have improved functionality able to… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,043
    Comparisons
    1,518
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    472
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    4,251
    Comparisons
    2,611
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    390
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Sourcefire SNORT
    TippingPoint Digital Vaccine, TippingPoint DV, Trend Micro Digital Vaccine, Trend Micro DV, Trend Micro TippingPoint NGIPS
    Learn More
    Overview

    Snort is an open-source, rule-based, intrusion detection and prevention system. It combines the benefits of signature-, protocol-, and anomaly-based inspection methods to deliver flexible protection from malware attacks. Snort gained notoriety for being able to accurately detect threats at high speeds.

    Keep ahead of the latest threats and protect your critical data with ongoing threat prevention and analysis.

    Sample Customers
    CareCore, City of Biel, Dimension Data, LightEdge, Lone Star College System, National Rugby League, Port Aventura, Smart City Networks, Telecom Italia, The Department of Education in Western Australia
    Yapi Kredi
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Individual & Family Service9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Government9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Government17%
    Healthcare Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise39%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise62%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise20%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is ranked 12th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 18 reviews while Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is ranked 8th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 19 reviews. Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is rated 7.6, while Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Sourcefire SNORT writes "An IPS solution for security and protection but lacks stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System writes "Operates in-line in the network, blocking malicious and unwanted traffic". Cisco Sourcefire SNORT is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate IPS, Cisco NGIPS, Check Point IPS, Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and Fortra's Tripwire Enterprise, whereas Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Discovery, Check Point IPS, Fortinet FortiGate IPS, Palo Alto Networks Advanced Threat Prevention and Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall. See our Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection System report.

    See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) vendors.

    We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.