We performed a comparison between Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and Ivanti Neurons for RBVM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."The risk context of any vulnerability is a valuable feature."
More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Pros →
"Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it."
"An improvement would be some sort of an integration with any GRC suite."
More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Cons →
"I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7 has."
More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is ranked 11th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is ranked 32nd in Vulnerability Management. Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is rated 8.0, while Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) writes "Offers contextual prioritization and risk-based remediation of vulnerability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for RBVM writes "Useful for vulnerability management with many integrations". Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is most compared with Rapid7 InsightVM, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Brinqa and Avalor, whereas Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus and Vulcan Cyber.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.