We compared Cisco Webex Experience Management and Freshdesk across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Features: Cisco Webex Experience Management is notable for its ability to analyze real-time customer feedback, provide customizable surveys, perform sentiment analysis, and generate comprehensive reports. Freshdesk stands out for its ease of use and customizability. It enables users to connect with different folders and integrate seamlessly. Reviewers also mentioned Freshdesk’s strong reporting and comprehensive knowledge base.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Webex Experience Management could improve its user interface, reporting, and analytics capabilities. Freshdesk could improve its ticketing system, reporting templates, integration with Freshcaller, and implementation of feature requests.
Service and Support: Cisco Webex received positive reviews for its responsive and efficient support team. Freshdesk’s customer service is regarded as efficient and prompt. Users described it as excellent, speedy, and attentive.
Ease of Deployment: Cisco Webex Experience Management is commended for its trouble-free setup, and professional support is available for those who need it. Freshdesk’s setup is quick, painless, and can be completed without outside help.
Pricing: Reviewers have provided no information regarding the cost of Cisco Webex Experience Management. Opinions about Freshdesk’s pricing are mixed. Some find it competitive and affordable, while others find it expensive, particularly when expanding or adding features.
ROI: Reviewers have left no feedback on the ROI of Cisco Webex Experience Management. Freshdesk improves the efficiency of customer management, addressing requests, and organizing documentation, resulting in a favorable return on investment.
Comparison Results: Users like Cisco Webex Experience Management for its easy deployment and real-time feedback analysis. However, it has a complicated user interface, and the solution’s reporting and analytics features are limited. Freshdesk is highly regarded for its user-friendly interface, easy setup process, customizable features, seamless connectivity, and efficient reporting abilities. Still, there is room for improvement in areas like ticketing, integrations, reporting templates, and pricing.
"It works well in general, we haven't had any issues with it. It is stable and useful."
"Freshdesk significantly improved our customer issue resolution process. We can now easily record and track all customer requests, ensuring that no tickets are lost."
"The user experience on the platform itself is fantastic. The UI is clean and uncluttered, so it's easy to find any information about your customer or the issue at hand. You can find out the person responsible for that particular issue, what the problem is, who the stakeholders are, and how to resolve it. There are lots of tools that will help you do that as well."
"Technical support is outstanding."
"It is very easy to make reports."
"Omnichannel is one of the most valuable features of the solution."
"It's easy to use and integrates with other tools. We can embed Jira into it, link Jira tickets with Freshdesk tickets, and use it for our knowledge base."
"The organization that is possible with other departments is the solution's most valuable aspect."
"It's free of charge for us. For our scale of business, it's very important. We don't have a lot of tickets."
"It is very expensive but there are no additional charges after it's purchased."
"While it's good for a small number of tickets, definitely in the future, we will require something more powerful."
"Having so many tags makes everyday work a lot more complicated, and a lot more time-consuming."
"It should enhance its service and its reporting capabilities."
"The reporting, analysis modules and insights capabilities for this solution could be improved."
"Freshdesk could improve its capabilities. It's missing the article formatting, and the overall look and feel make it not easy to use. The administration instructions on how to manage the automation, capability, and integration with third parties, such as chat or bots, are very important in these types of solutions."
"It would be helpful to pull reports or schedule them based on agents, users, ticket numbers, or responses."
"There are a few things we have asked for, like a forward button. When a ticket comes in, we forward it, but it doesn't sync up with the forward. That is the one they have to rework. The other is when we forward the ticket, it doesn't go all, or certain things don't go with it. We have told them about it, and they are working on it. It would be better if they gave us a more standard reporting template. Although they already have some, many aren't usable. It would be easier if we had more templates to work with."
"Technical support is not the best. It could be much, much better and offer better support to users."
Cisco Webex Experience Management is ranked 10th in Customer Experience Management with 1 review while Freshdesk is ranked 2nd in Customer Experience Management with 27 reviews. Cisco Webex Experience Management is rated 6.0, while Freshdesk is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Webex Experience Management writes "Very stable but exceptionally costly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Freshdesk writes "Incredibly user-friendly, flexible, and affordable". Cisco Webex Experience Management is most compared with Teradata Customer Interaction Manager, whereas Freshdesk is most compared with JIRA Service Management, ServiceNow, Microsoft Dynamics CRM, Spiceworks and TOPdesk.
See our list of best Customer Experience Management vendors.
We monitor all Customer Experience Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.