We performed a comparison between Citrix Gateway and Sangfor SSL VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two SSL VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The features that we have found most valuable are the web app support and VPN."
"I didn't have any hiccups or issues with it."
"Most of our customers are using the load balancing feature and also the verification feature is good as well, in my experience."
"Providing our organization the ability to work remotely was the most valuable feature of Citrix Gateway. I also enjoy that they are always adding features."
"It performs quite well."
"We haven't received any complaints or performance issues so far."
"The initial setup is simple. Normally with all setups, it's not very complicated. It really depends on the customer."
"It is easy to set up and is stable. It is scalable as well, depending on the model."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of the product is very easy."
"The platform is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is our ability to limit access by user, IP address, or MAC address."
"Sangfor SSL VPN provides secure encryption for communication."
"Sangfor SSL VPN is a secure and user-friendly solution."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"We have experienced issues relating to multi-factor authentication"
"There could be a faster connection, increased user-friendliness, and more comprehensive dashboards for the platform."
"When it comes to the VDA environment, making it additionally stable is important."
"We are currently looking at automation. It would be good if there is some way to automate it in a fast way. It should be easy to automate. It also has some security issues."
"Sometimes the input-output has issues."
"Its interface could be made a lot easier. It is very kludgy."
"The major issue is price. I would also like them to make other aspects more accessible."
"I would like to see improved logging because it doesn't keep much information for the session monitoring or historical sessions."
"The technical support team takes around two months to respond to queries. It is very time-consuming."
"Sangfor SSL VPN should provide advanced protection against ransomware and better data analysis."
"I think Sangfor can provide a web-based SSL VPN version."
"No solution is perfect, so there is room for improvement."
"In redundancy mode, when the firewall goes off, the VPN should be able to connect to the secondary firewall automatically."
Citrix Gateway is ranked 2nd in SSL VPN with 33 reviews while Sangfor SSL VPN is ranked 6th in SSL VPN with 5 reviews. Citrix Gateway is rated 8.2, while Sangfor SSL VPN is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Citrix Gateway writes "Provided the ability for remote work during the pandemic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sangfor SSL VPN writes "A secure and user-friendly solution that is simple to implement and configure". Citrix Gateway is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), Fortinet FortiClient, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and Ivanti Connect Secure, whereas Sangfor SSL VPN is most compared with Sangfor EasyConnect, Peplink SpeedFusion, AWS Direct Connect, Hillstone E-Series and OpenVPN Access Server. See our Citrix Gateway vs. Sangfor SSL VPN report.
See our list of best SSL VPN vendors and best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all SSL VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.