We performed a comparison between CockroachDB and Oracle Database based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."CockroachDB is highly reliable."
"The product has valuable security features."
"The tool's most valuable feature is node syncing, which takes only 0.54 milliseconds."
"I use CockroachDB to test big data samples and to create the best structure for databases. We have four users and required 10 people for deployment and maintenance."
"The subset of SQL that my client is using is completely supported."
"The availability and the easy to use feature is the most valuable. The documentation is also good."
"The best feature of CockroachDB is the ability to keep the nodes in different locations."
"The initial setup and deployment are simple."
"In general, the product is strong enough and offers high performance."
"The thing two things that I like most about Oracle Database are its scalability and performance."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Database are the Data Guard because it does replication and the integration layer, such as GoldenGate."
"It is user-friendly. Its performance and security are also very good. There are 300 million records for our one-year data, and we can easily query this data. You can use Oracle Database as a source for easily integrating with different databases and applications. It supports Java platforms and other applications very well. It works with SAP products better than Microsoft SQL Server."
"The support is always very helpful and responsive."
"It's very stable and highly available. I also like the row-level locking feature. It can manage billions of rows of data."
"It is one of the most reliable database systems."
"Oracle Database is the best based on stability and high performance."
"The closer they can make CockroachDB to being completely compatible with Postgres, the better. It's almost compatible, but not completely. If it was, it would be nice to just be able to use Postgres libraries without any fiddling."
"Cockroach does not support all types of protocols. I need to improve it myself to support a CouchDB on my network."
"CockroachDB needs to improve store processes."
"The initial setup and pricing could be improved."
"I find the serverless offer a bit confusing."
"The product must improve its disaster recovery features."
"The platform could be more extensible."
"We are looking for more features to support distributed high availability and geo-partitioning."
"The pricing is the one sticking point for the solution because it is very expensive."
"The price could be better. Oracle Database could also be easier to scale."
"Frankly speaking, Oracle Database is very expensive."
"Security is an area that needs to be improved."
"I can only remember that setting up Oracle Database was a pain because it uses Java."
"If Oracle Database could have more build-in features from some of their other products it would be good."
"The pricing needs to be improved."
"The setup for Enterprise Manager Grid Control can be a bit easier."
CockroachDB is ranked 9th in Relational Databases Tools with 10 reviews while Oracle Database is ranked 2nd in Relational Databases Tools with 282 reviews. CockroachDB is rated 8.0, while Oracle Database is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CockroachDB writes "Open source with extensive documentation and a University for training". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database writes "Supports a large volume of transactions compared to other databases". CockroachDB is most compared with MySQL, Citus Data, Amazon Aurora, SQL Server and MariaDB, whereas Oracle Database is most compared with SAP HANA, SQL Server, MariaDB, IBM Db2 Database and IBM Informix. See our CockroachDB vs. Oracle Database report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.