Comindware Tracker vs IBM WebSphere BPMS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comindware Logo
143 views|55 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
124 views|86 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and IBM WebSphere BPMS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Low code development.""This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them.""This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction.""​It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files.​""The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions.""I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day.​""Customize workflow processes visually and interactively.""The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."

More Comindware Tracker Pros →

"This product is flexible in its ability to integrate processes and it can be extended and integrated with other software.""The UI capabilities of the solution are great. The speed of delivery is good.""We like the feature in which we can trace back instances."

More IBM WebSphere BPMS Pros →

Cons
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con.""There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help.""If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable.""I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose.""The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky.""The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation.""I am expecting new updates to improve the software.""Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."

More Comindware Tracker Cons →

"The user interface could be improved, and although integration opportunities are good, they could be improved further.""The solution lacks acceptable stability.""Sometimes there are tasks that failed without any reason."

More IBM WebSphere BPMS Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."
  • "Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."
  • "The price is so reasonable."
  • "I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"
  • "The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."
  • "This solution has a very lost cost."
  • "Great value for the money."
  • More Comindware Tracker Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    33rd
    out of 66 in Process Automation
    Views
    143
    Comparisons
    55
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    32nd
    out of 66 in Process Automation
    Views
    124
    Comparisons
    86
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    WebSphere BPMS
    Learn More
    Overview

    Non-coding workflow software for business process modelling and management, automation of business operations, and workflow productivity boost. Minimize dependency on IT and allows non-technical users to design, run and modify Workflows with drag-and-drop simplicity.

    A wide variety of workflow management solutions have been built with Comindware Tracker across all industries, departments, and workflow scenarios and brought transparency and accountability in businesses.

    Key benefits of Comindware Workflow Software:

    • Quick workflow setup with no IT resource required
    • On-the-fly changes to workflows, forms, and data
    • Easy implementation thanks to the Outlook-style interface
    • Unified Document and Data Management
    • Advanced analytics and reporting for effective Workflow Management
    • Cloud, on-premises and hybrid deployment

    The Workflow Management system enables non-code addition and modification of workflows with no interruption to ongoing activities. It ensures quick-win implementation and reduces expenses.


    Information Not Available
    Sample Customers
    Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services
    Schahin Group, Korean Credit Card Company, Versicherungskammer Bayern, Biogrid Australia
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization60%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Comms Service Provider5%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise21%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise65%
    Large Enterprise25%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Comindware Tracker is ranked 33rd in Process Automation while IBM WebSphere BPMS is ranked 32nd in Process Automation. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while IBM WebSphere BPMS is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM WebSphere BPMS writes "Standardizes and automates business processes for efficiency ". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas IBM WebSphere BPMS is most compared with . See our Comindware Tracker vs. IBM WebSphere BPMS report.

    See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.