Confluent vs Dell Streaming Data Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Confluent Logo
9,953 views|7,614 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Dell Technologies Logo
245 views|182 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Confluent and Dell Streaming Data Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Databricks, Microsoft and others in Streaming Analytics.
To learn more, read our detailed Streaming Analytics Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We mostly use the solution's message queues and event-driven architecture.""The monitoring module is impressive.""The most valuable is its capability to enhance the documentation process, particularly when creating software documentation.""Confluence's greatest asset is its user-friendly interface, coupled with its remarkable ability to seamlessly integrate with a vast range of other solutions.""The solution can handle a high volume of data because it works and scales well.""One of the best features of Confluent is that it's very easy to search and have a live status with Jira.""Their tech support is amazing; they are very good, both on and off-site.""Implementing Confluent's schema registry has significantly enhanced our organization's data quality assurance."

More Confluent Pros →

"The performance and price is good."

More Dell Streaming Data Platform Pros →

Cons
"there is room for improvement in the visualization.""Confluent has a good monitoring tool, but it's not customizable.""Confluent's price needs improvement.""It could have more integration with different platforms.""Areas for improvement include implementing multi-storage support to differentiate between database stores based on data age and optimizing storage costs.""It could have more themes. They should also have more reporting-oriented plugins as well. It would be great to have free custom reports that can be dispatched directly from Jira.""They should remove Zookeeper because of security issues.""There is no local support team in Saudi Arabia."

More Confluent Cons →

"Improvement can be made by implementing a clear sales point that guides users in making choices, especially for virtualization purposes."

More Dell Streaming Data Platform Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Confluent is expensive, I would prefer, Apache Kafka over Confluent because of the high cost of maintenance."
  • "You have to pay additional for one or two features."
  • "The pricing model of Confluent could improve because if you have a classic use case where you're going to use all the features there is no plan to reduce the features. You should be able to pick and choose basic services at a reduced price. The pricing was high for our needs. We should not have to pay for features we do not use."
  • "On a scale from one to ten, where one is low pricing and ten is high pricing, I would rate Confluent's pricing at five. I have not encountered any additional costs."
  • "Confluence's pricing is quite reasonable, with a cost of around $10 per user that decreases as the number of users increases. Additionally, it's worth noting that for teams of up to 10 users, the solution is completely free."
  • "Confluent has a yearly license, which is a bit high because it's on a per-user basis."
  • "It comes with a high cost."
  • "Confluent is highly priced."
  • More Confluent Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is good. With PowerScale, purchasing involves upfront usable capacity, typically with a price per terabyte."
  • More Dell Streaming Data Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I find Confluent's Kafka Connectors and Kafka Streams invaluable for my use cases because they simplify real-time data processing and ETL tasks by providing reliable, pre-packaged connectors and… more »
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing of Confluent as average, around a five out of ten. Additional costs could include features like multi-tenancy support and native encryption with custom algorithms, which would… more »
    Top Answer:Areas for improvement include implementing multi-storage support to differentiate between database stores based on data age and optimizing storage costs, as well as enhancing the offset management… more »
    Top Answer:The performance and price is good.
    Top Answer:The pricing is good. With PowerScale, purchasing involves upfront usable capacity, typically with a price per terabyte. The solution's expansion is straightforward as you can easily upgrade your… more »
    Top Answer:Improvement can be made by implementing a clear sales point that guides users in making choices, especially for virtualization purposes. An online calculator would be a helpful addition for this… more »
    Ranking
    4th
    out of 38 in Streaming Analytics
    Views
    9,953
    Comparisons
    7,614
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    415
    Rating
    8.4
    16th
    out of 38 in Streaming Analytics
    Views
    245
    Comparisons
    182
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    250
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Confluent is an enterprise-ready, full-scale streaming platform that enhances Apache Kafka. 

    Confluent has integrated cutting-edge features that are designed to enhance these tasks: 

    • Speed up application development and connectivity
    • Enable transformations through stream processing
    • Streamline business operations at scale
    • Adhere to strict architectural standards

    Confluent is a more complete distribution of Kafka in that it enhances the integration possibilities of Kafka by introducing tools for managing and optimizing Kafka clusters while providing methods for making sure the streams are secure. Confluent supports publish-and-subscribe as well as the storing and processing of data within the streams. Kafka is easier to operate and build thanks to Confluent.

    Confluent's software is available in three different varieties: 

    1. A free, open-source streaming platform that makes it simple to start using real-time data streams
    2. An enterprise-grade version of the product with more administrative, ops, and monitoring tools
    3. A premium cloud-based version.

    Confluent Advantage Features

    Confluent has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Multi-language

      • Clients: C++, Python, Go, and .NET
      • REST proxy: Can connect to Kafka from any connected network device
      • Admin REST APIs: RESTful interface for performing administrator operations
    • Pre-built ecosystem

      • Connectors: More than 100 supported connectors, including S3, Elastic, HDFS, JDBC
      • MQTT proxy: Gain access to Kafka from MQTT gateways and devices
      • Schema registry: Centralized database to guarantee data compatibility
    • Streaming database

      • ksqlDB: Materialized views and real-time stream processing
    • GUI management 

      • Control panel: GUI for scalable Kafka management and monitoring
      • Health+: Smart alerts and cloud-based control centers
    • DevOps automation that is flexible

      • Confluent for Kubernetes: Complete API to deploy on Kubernetes
      • Automated Ansible deployment on non-containerized environments
    • Dynamic performance 

      • Self-balancing clusters: Automated partition re-balancing across brokers in the cluster
      • Tiered storage: Older Kafka data offloading to object storage with transparent access
    • Security that is enterprise-grade 

      • Role-based access control: Granular user/group access authorization
      • Audit logs that are structured: Logs of user actions kept in dedicated Kafka topics
      • Secret protection: Sensitive information is encrypted
    • Global resilience

      • Linking clusters: A real-time, highly reliable, and consistent bridge across on-premises and cloud environments
      • Multiple-region clusters: Single Kafka cluster with automated client failover distributed across multiple data centers
      • Replicator: Asynchronous replication that is based on the Kafka Connect framework
    • Support

      • Round the clock enterprise support from Kafka experts

    Reviews from Real Users

    Confluent stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its robust enterprise support and its open source option. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews: 

    Ravi B., a solutions architect at a tech services company, writes of the solution, “KSQL is a valuable feature, as is the Kafka Connect framework for connecting to the various source systems where you need not write the code. We get great support from Confluent because we're using the enterprise version and whenever there's a problem, they support us with fine-tuning and finding the root cause.”

    Amit S., an IT consultant, notes, “The biggest benefit is that it is open source. You have the flexibility of opting or not opting for enterprise support, even though the tool itself is open source.” He adds, “The second benefit is it's very modern and built on Java and Scala. You can extend the features very well, and it doesn't take a lot of effort to do so.”

    Dell EMC Streaming Data Platform, an innovative enterprise-grade software
    platform, empowers organizations by harnessing their real-time and historical
    data in a single, auto-scale infrastructure and programming model. Using the
    Streaming Data Platform, organizations can achieve improvement towards
    innovation throughout their entire ecosystem and harness the power of every
    piece of their massive data set.

    Sample Customers
    ING, Priceline.com, Nordea, Target, RBC, Tivo, Capital One, Chartboost
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company31%
    Retailer15%
    Non Tech Company8%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Retailer6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise52%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Streaming Analytics
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Databricks, Microsoft and others in Streaming Analytics. Updated: April 2024.
    770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Confluent is ranked 4th in Streaming Analytics with 19 reviews while Dell Streaming Data Platform is ranked 16th in Streaming Analytics with 1 review. Confluent is rated 8.4, while Dell Streaming Data Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Confluent writes "Has good technical support services and a valuable feature for real-time data streaming ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dell Streaming Data Platform writes "The solution’s clear-cut pricing makes scalability a cinch". Confluent is most compared with Amazon MSK, Amazon Kinesis, Databricks, AWS Glue and Oracle GoldenGate, whereas Dell Streaming Data Platform is most compared with .

    See our list of best Streaming Analytics vendors.

    We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.