We performed a comparison between Coralogix and MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"One of the more valuable features is the stability of the platform."
"The scalability is good. It's passable."
"Anypoint is very capable in terms of scalability."
"MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager has the most valuable data components and can integrate APIs across multiple microservices."
"We use it heavily because Azure offers better pricing than its competitors."
"Anypoint API Manager's most valuable feature is its connectors."
"The auto-creation of the API documentation is useful."
"The most valuable features are API development and API management."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"There should be more pricing options or certain discounts for the education sector."
"I think that they can bring some transparency in reference to the terms of the microservices architecture."
"In the next release, Mulesoft should make it easier for people who don't have the native connectors to build their own rather than using the APA from the power platform or outlet."
"We have issues with the tool's pricing. The product seemed to have most of the features required for the tasks I was working on. I didn't feel the need for additional features. However, one aspect that could be improved is making the platform more user-friendly for non-technical users. While it's not necessarily complex, it does require some familiarity. Unlike open-source tools available online, accessing and using this product may not be as straightforward. It needs to offer training to its users."
"The pricing is quite expensive. It should be adjusted to make it more affordable for users."
"The initial setup, if you go back three or three and a half years, definitely, for us, was complex."
"Better documentation to help explain each of the features would be really helpful."
"I would like to see MuleSoft expand the range of APIs you can manage with it beyond HTTP, GIPC, and others."
More MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Coralogix is ranked 13th in API Management with 7 reviews while MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is ranked 4th in API Management with 47 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager writes "Responsive technical support, low tickets issued showing great stability, and limitless expansion". Coralogix is most compared with Datadog, Grafana, Sentry, New Relic and Instana Dynamic APM, whereas MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, IBM API Connect and Kong Gateway Enterprise. See our Coralogix vs. MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.