We performed a comparison between Corero and Radware DefensePro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The DDoS protection features are valuable."
"It is a good solution. Its vendor support is the most valuable. It is simple and works well if you have Juniper MX routers."
"SmartWall devices occupy only one-fourth of the width of a rack unit, making them very easy to install."
"The most valuable feature of Corero is its ability to handle smaller attacks in terms of the amount of volume and time. You can handle almost 100 perfect of the attacks locally."
"This is a hybrid solution."
"It is an agnostic and transparent inline platform, which means that the maximum visibility of the symmetric and asymmetric traffic is available, even allowing bidirectional detection of the attack."
"They have a hybrid model approach if a client wants to go that way."
"Radware DefensePro is one of the best solutions for on-premise protection."
"The pricing is reasonable. It's not overly expensive."
"A flexible affordable solution for defense against DDos attacks."
"This solution is extremely scalable and has the highest level throughput (100G) which complies with Telco deployment."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The DDoS protection that the solution provides is its most valuable feature."
"The important features include automated protection and defense against many attacks, it's important that our networks are protected in the Radware cloud."
"The approach taken by Corero is to partner with other organizations in order to address volumetric attacks that cannot be handled by the hardware installed in the infrastructure. Corero does not have a solution for these attacks, so they are looking for partners to help them manage them. This approach is supplemented by local hardware, but the main focus is on the partnerships. It would be beneficial to have a more complete solution."
"Lacks international presence."
"It could use support in Spanish."
"The product must provide more Layer 7 capabilities."
"Juniper is known in our country, but it is not very popular. There is also not enough information about Corero. Our enterprise and financial sectors don't know about this solution. They need to provide more information and do more marketing for this solution in our country."
"This solution may not cover all of the requirements in situations for which I am unfamiliar, and there is always room for improvement."
"I had some trouble in the registration account prior to deployment, but it was fixed. They were not very fast or responsive, however. It took about one week to resolve the issue."
"I would like to have more granular steps according to protected bandwidth, so the granularity should be better."
"Right now, we have DefensePro 6. The only complaint I have is that SSL inspection, when activated, consumes a lot of resources on the machine. We are currently reviewing a possible change to DefensePro X, the new version, which has a separate module with its processors."
"If they would go to a cloud-based approach, that would give much more flexibility in terms of working with them."
"This product would be improved if ongoing live monitoring with dashboards were added."
"Radware DefensePro requires a continuous learning process. Using this technology, we can improve our network. Based on the different attack mechanisms, we use Radware DefensePro to provide security for our clients' networks very effectively."
"It would be ideal if they could expand protocol support to cover emerging communication standards and ensure comprehensive protection against diverse attack vectors."
Corero is ranked 17th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 5 reviews while Radware DefensePro is ranked 5th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 23 reviews. Corero is rated 8.4, while Radware DefensePro is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Corero writes "Effect local attack handling, intuitive interface, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware DefensePro writes "Regular signature update with good reporting and analytics". Corero is most compared with Arbor DDoS, Cloudflare, Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service, Lumen DDoS Mitigation and Nexusguard DDoS Protection, whereas Radware DefensePro is most compared with Arbor DDoS, Cloudflare, Imperva DDoS, Fortinet FortiDDoS and F5 Silverline Managed Services. See our Corero vs. Radware DefensePro report.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.