We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and Fortinet FortiClient based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution allows me to give access and privileges to each user individually"
"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. The PAM wallet and enterprise password wallet are good also good."
"The password rotation and the session recording are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its high performance, it's the best identity security platform. The security is good. It's easy to showcase the feature and capabilities and compare it with other competitors. It competes well with other solutions. Additionally, it is a complete solution."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance."
"The solution is scalable."
"Users can scale the solution."
"It has drastically reduced the attack surface for local administrative rights and the chance of escalation of privilege. We've removed, at this point, close to 98 percent of the local administrative accounts on workstations. If there were an incident, it would stop at that point and we'd be able to know."
"I find it very easy to configure and also very stable."
"We like its centralized administration, integration with Active Directory, deployment, and stability of the connection."
"I use the tool to connect server to an ISP Data Center."
"We find the VPN features valuable."
"This solution is very stable."
"I think the solution is highly scalable."
"The product is user-friendly."
"From an application perspective, this solution is stable."
"Compared to other tools like Linux, this solution isn't as user-friendly."
"The solution can be complex to use at times."
"Can be improved by allowing computers to be excluded from policies."
"The solution is very expensive."
"The turnaround time of the support team is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is not suitable for the current situation because when you compare it to OTP, OTP is the strongest password solution. You can use it as a one-time password, but you have to log into the password manager itself and if you don't change your password, it will be the weakest link in the security. In OTP, you don't have that weakest link."
"It is hard to deal with technical support if you are not certified."
"The price of the solution should improve."
"The solution could improve by providing analytics or detailed reports."
"The solution requires skillful users."
"There is lagging in some of the authentication tools to support the newer versions, this is happening because they are not supported."
"Technical support needs to determine priority level based on the cases rather than the support package bundle."
"We've got one client where it was blocking the smartphones, and there's a way to set it up on Fortigate that's supposed to do that. However, it didn't work with them since they had a 2FA multi-factor."
"It would be interesting if the solution offered a way to try to investigate and create a use case to trace vectors."
"Everybody else is doing AI, machine learning, self-healing, next-generation features. It needs more next-generation features. Everybody else is doing AI, machine learning, self-healing, next-generation features. It needs more next-generation features."
"It has a horrible performance. It is one of the most unstable VPNs I have ever used."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 28 reviews while Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 15th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 86 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.2, while Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Tanium, whereas Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Fortinet FortiEDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. Fortinet FortiClient report.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
