We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and SentinelOne Singularity Complete based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The department management aspect of the solution is the most valuable aspect."
"We were able to reduce the number of privileged accounts by 50%, which helped to simplify our privileged access management environment."
"Users can scale the solution."
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager are password management, session management, onboarding rules, platform customization, and safety management."
"The product is very flexible"
"The solution allows me to give access and privileges to each user individually"
"I like that you can remove the admin rights from the user's computer and have control over the environment. That means you can delete the local admins and grant them proper privileges with the console. So, they will get proper permissions for applications they need, but we don't have to do it. In the domain where we don't have control, the user can only do specified actions, but not all of them."
"The product is stable."
"The product is a lighter client. Our previous solution ran heavy on the workstation and caused performance issues."
"The protection and management provided by SentinelOne is good."
"The Storyline feature has significantly affected our incident response time. Originally, what would take us hours, now it takes us several minutes."
"It is a good endpoint solution. That's the reason we chose it. We looked at other solutions, such as CrowdStrike, and based on the cost and the services it delivers, it was the better choice."
"The portal is the most valuable feature because it provides us with a single pane of glass view and is highly intuitive."
"We have had very few false positives or false negatives, which allows our analysts to focus on their work instead of dealing with noise."
"It identifies what applications are vulnerable. If I go to the applications, such as Adobe Photoshop or Adobe Reader, I can see our current list of vulnerabilities: How many are vulnerable and how many need to be updated with patching. One of the most valuable aspects is the ease of finding specific vulnerabilities."
"The most valuable features of SentinelOne are the endpoint detection of threats, and it does not only rely on signatures for detection."
"The tool should be more user-friendly."
"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."
"They need much better integration with Azure AD."
"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required. The product's price should be made more flexible."
"It is hard to deal with technical support if you are not certified."
"Technical support is slow to respond when we run into issues."
"We have had some major issues with the tool, but we have worked with the R&D teams and we have worked with support. There is room for improvement, especially on response times. But they're working on it and they're doing the best they can."
"The product needs a streamlined user interface; improvements to the user interface can enhance user experience and make the solution more intuitive to navigate."
"There is room for improvement with the management interface. It could be more user friendly."
"The previous vendor had a lot more features and capabilities under the license. For example, I lost DLP as Sentinel One does not have DLP."
"I would appreciate it if they would consider providing a comprehensive vulnerability assessment report that goes beyond just application vulnerabilities."
"Communication and documentation could be improved."
"I would like to have a remote desktop feature added so we can remotely access our endpoints."
"The role-based access is in dire need of improvement. We actually discussed this on a roadmap call and were informed that it was coming, but then it was delayed. It limits the roles that you can have in the platform, and we require several custom roles. We work with a lot of third-parties whom we rely on for some of our IT services. Part of those are an external SOC function where they are over-provisioned in the solution because there isn't anything relevant for the level of work that they do."
"DLP support would be a good addition."
"The solution does not have an application security and control module."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 28 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 179 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.2, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Complete writes "Provides peace of mind and is good at ingesting data and correlating". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Complete is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Darktrace, CrowdStrike Falcon, ThreatLocker Protect and Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete report.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
