We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Keeper based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."I like the integrations for external applications."
"Ensures accounts are managed according to corporate policies."
"It is one of the best solutions in the market. Ever since I started using this solution, there has not been any compromise when it comes to our lab."
"Within the solution, I love the fact that everything is recorded. The configuration capabilities are great, too."
"The product is for hardening access and making the organization more secure, therefore reducing chances of a breach."
"It has the ability to scale out. We have scaled out quite a bit with our product and use of it to get to multiple locations and businesses, so it has the breadth to do that."
"The fact that I can put my vault here in a central location on one net for example, and I'll have a CPM in California, a CPM in Texas, a CPM in New York, a CPM in Florida, and actually be able to grow with my company and not necessarily have to continue to grow my vault until I get to a certain number accounts - yet I can still manage everything across the country, if not the world - I love that. I love the flexibility and the capability of being able to pull those components out."
"The password management feature is valuable."
"Available for Windows platforms and also Mac OS and Linux systems."
"I like Keeper's mobility and its accessibility."
"i have only one password to remember, which is the one to get me into Keeper."
"The generator of complex passwords keeps me safe from being hacked."
"It is very easy to install and setup."
"The installation and its use are very simple."
"Keeper has strong security features."
"Support is very quick to respond, and they have fixed any issues that I have had."
"This product needs professional consulting services to onboard accounts effectively based user profiles."
"More additional features as far as the REST is concerned, because we have something which was the predecessor to REST. A lot of the features which were in the predecessor have not necessarily been ported over to REST yet."
"CyberArk has to continue to evolve with that threat landscape to make sure that they're still protecting those credentials that are owned by those that have privileged accounts in the firms."
"I would like to see is the policy export and import. When we expend, we do not want to just hand do a policy."
"There is some stuff that we still have not fully integrated, which is our AIM solution. We are having all types of issues with it. I have been working with Level 3 support on it, but otherwise, from a functionality perspective, everything has been working except for the AIM solution."
"The product is very vaulting-focused. I'd love to see it expanding its capabilities a bit further into areas like just-in-time elevation, and access with non-vaulted credentials."
"I would love them to improve their UI customizing features."
"The Vault's disaster recovery features need improvement."
"Search functions are sometimes weird."
"Needs to provide an API to be integrated with the information systems and offer secure file hosting service with sharing and editing capabilities."
"I would like to see a way to store files and photos in the next update. If it already does this, I have yet to explore it."
"If you purchase the premium, then after the subscription expires, you cannot edit your passwords any longer, even if you could before you purchased the paid subscription."
"The stability of the solution can be improved."
"Needs to improve KeeperFill on iOS."
"Ability to set up password profiles that can predefine custom fields and password complexity."
"The technical support for this solution could be faster support and improved if they had a better understanding of my questions."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 144 reviews while Keeper is ranked 11th in Enterprise Password Managers with 32 reviews. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while Keeper is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Keeper writes "It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas Keeper is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, Azure Key Vault, LastPass, Delinea Secret Server and AWS Secrets Manager.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.