We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Oracle Identity Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."The solution is stable."
"CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is stable."
"The technical support for this solution is very good. If I was to rate it on a scale of one to five, I would give it a five."
"Enterprise Password Vault, Privilege Session Manager, and Application Identity Management have been very useful for our client environment."
"We are utilizing CyberArk to secure applications, credentials, and endpoints."
"There are no issues with scalability. Our clients are very happy to use the product."
"The product has allowed us to improve both the management and access to privileged credentials, while also creating a full audit trail of all activities happening within isolated sessions of all tasks and activities taking place within the solution."
"Performance-wise, it is excellent."
"The proactive controls which can be configured to a granular level allowing the organization the flexibility to meet the changing demands of the workforce."
"Scalability-wise, I rate this solution a nine out of ten. Oracle Identity Governance is a scalable solution, without a doubt."
"It helps provision the required accesses through policies, approvals, and whatever would be the business requirement."
"The most valuable feature is the user manager certification that approves or removes user access."
"What I found most useful in Oracle Identity Governance, feature-wise, are provisioning, de-provisioning, and termination. Those features are very good. Oracle Identity Governance can also be easily integrated with non-Oracle products, which I find valuable."
"The most important features that have impacted our environment recently are the Single Sign-On solution, role based provisioning, and the automated provisioning of accounts to target systems."
"Password management is a valuable feature."
"I am able to request any access rights I need."
"Our DevOps team is looking in the direction of cloud, because we are not in it today. We are hoping to build it with Conjur from the ground up."
"CyberArk PAM could greatly benefit from an under-the-hood update; integrating machine learning algorithms could provide predictive insights."
"Overall what I would really love to see is the third-party PAS reporter tool pulled more into the overall solution, ideally as its own deployable component service installation package."
"The major pain point that we have is the capacity of CyberArk due to the sheer volume of NPAs that we are managing. We are a large organization and we have hundreds of thousands of non-personal accounts to manage. We have already found out that there are certain capacity limitations within CyberArk that might introduce performance issues. From my perspective, something that would be valuable would be if the vault could hold more passwords and be more scalable."
"Its pricing is a big challenge here. When it started, the product came in at a very low cost. Now, they are the leaders in the market, so the cost has grown and is quite huge."
"I think having a distributed architecture would certainly help this solution."
"I would like easier integrations for creating an online dashboard that executives would look at or are able to run reports from the tool."
"It is very complex and difficult to set up the solution."
"They need to improve their backup strategy."
"The user interface experience needs to be improved."
"t is too complex, has too many bugs, and is an immature product, even the best case, beta version."
"The cost of this product needs to be reduced."
"One of the areas that need some improvement with Oracle specifically is the ease of implementation."
"It responds fast but because of the bugs we have already had some major incidents and complete unavailability."
"It would be great if the Oracle Fusion Middleware team worked on making it compatible with other application servers, as it exists in OIM9.x."
"You need full visibility because the suite of features are complex and you have to be clear on what you want to implement."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 144 reviews while Oracle Identity Governance is ranked 10th in Identity Management (IM) with 66 reviews. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while Oracle Identity Governance is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Identity Governance writes "A scalable solution designed to meet the requirements of medium and large-sized companies". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas Oracle Identity Governance is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, One Identity Manager, Saviynt, Microsoft Identity Manager and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine).
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
