We performed a comparison between Dashlane and HashiCorp Vault based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Password Managers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The integration capabilities have been good."
"Dashlane's most valuable feature is Hotspot Shield, the VPN feature that allows you to connect securely to public wifi."
"The synchronization is the solution's most valuable feature. It works really well. The ability to have secure notes is also very helpful."
"I like the ability to share passwords without them being visible to other team members. The auto-fill capabilities are great too."
"The product is free and easy to use. It is well documented with an easy implementation process."
"The most valuable feature of HashiCorp Vault is the management of tickets in the pipeline."
"It can still be configured by a separate team other than developers. That's why I think it's more secure."
"The most valuable feature of HashiCorp Vault is that it's an open source solution. Second, it's cloud agnostic, so it's very easy to maintain and control, which is why we prefer HashiCorp."
"For me, the most valuable features include that it's easy to manage and maintain the password API for retrieving passwords and other things."
"This solution is easy to use and to integrate."
"The tool's dynamic rotation of the password credentials is good."
"It is an added value for our customers to have a Secrets Management workflow available that is PaaS/CaaS/KaaS Platform agnostic."
"There should also be an easier way to be able to transfer user data to other users who have kind of left the company."
"The integration with the VPN feature could be smoother."
"It would be nice to have the solution localized in Europe. Dashlane is an American company. It's controlled by American laws and regulations that allows the American government to have full access to my data with Dashlane. That's why I am leaving Dashlane, because we can't accept such an important function in American control."
"The cost, while decent, of course, could always be less."
"I don't think there are any major improvements required—so far, so good. However, I think that having more training materials, such as videos, and documentation available would be helpful. I would prefer to have more videos available either on the official site or on YouTube."
"The product is complicated to install."
"The documentation is very general; it should have more examples and more use cases."
"A drawback for some clients who have to be PCI compliant is that they still need to use and subscribe to an HSM (Hardware Security Module) solution."
"The technical support was hard to get a hold of and lacking in service."
"The product needs to improve its customization. It should be also more like easy to plug and play."
"I would like to see better integration of HashiCorp Vault with SAP products."
"The solution's initial setup process is complicated."
Dashlane is ranked 12th in Enterprise Password Managers with 4 reviews while HashiCorp Vault is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Password Managers with 16 reviews. Dashlane is rated 9.0, while HashiCorp Vault is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Dashlane writes "Easy to set up, simple to use, and quite secure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HashiCorp Vault writes "Useful for machine-to-machine communication and has secret engine feature ". Dashlane is most compared with Azure Key Vault, LastPass, Keeper, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault and IronVest, whereas HashiCorp Vault is most compared with Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault and Keeper. See our Dashlane vs. HashiCorp Vault report.
See our list of best Enterprise Password Managers vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.