Databricks vs Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Databricks Logo
28,492 views|18,008 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
14,211 views|11,608 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 20, 2022

We performed a comparison between Databrick and Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: Most users of both solutions feel that deploying them is relatively easy and straightforward. One user of Databricks notes that implementing it is a code-heavy process. A user of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio notes that while it is easy to implement, it involves a greater number of steps than deploying Databricks does. Another user notes that it requires very little coding to deploy.
  • Features: Databricks users find it to be highly scalable and point out that it has many other valuable features, including its fast data loading process and data storage capabilities. However, there are users who feel that its ability to integrate with other products could be improved.

    Users of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio find it to be reliable and point out that it has many valuable features, including its user-friendly user interface and machine learning capabilities. One user notes that its machine learning capabilities are more powerful than that of Databricks. However, one user notes that it should have better security capabilities.
  • Pricing: Databricks users find it to be an expensive solution. Reviewers of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio are divided over how affordable they find it to be.
  • Service and Support: Users of both solutions note that, for the most part, they are supported by excellent technological support teams. They also note that both solutions have great documentation.

Comparison of Results: Based on the parameters we compared, Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio seems to be a slightly superior solution. All other things being more or less equal, our reviewers found Databricks rather expensive to purchase. Some users also feel that Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio has better machine learning capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Databricks vs. Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio Report (Updated: March 2024).
770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: Which do you prefer - Databricks or Azure Machine Learning Studio?
Answer: Databricks gives you the option of working with several different languages, such as SQL, R, Scala, Apache Spark, or Python. It offers many different cluster choices and excellent integration with MLFlow. It allows for migration from one environment to another with tremendous ease. This solution is very scalable and can process large amounts of data very quickly. It is also very user-friendly, as not a lot of knowledge is needed to run it. As this solution is cloud-based, start-up time is easy and super fast. Azure Machine Learning Studio offers ready-made data samples and has some very useful modeling parameter settings. They offer courses and certifications within the solution, which makes it very attractive and beneficial for many users. This solution is very easy to use for teams with less experience and for those that are just getting started with the ML experience. This is really an amazing low-code/no-code solution. The solution is very scalable, with great flexibility. Databricks needs samples and templates for users to see exactly what the solution can do. Overall integration with other products could be better, and many times the error messages we have received have been vague and ambiguous, making it challenging to debug and thereby slowing down the overall process. Databricks can also be very costly as one scales up. Microsoft Machine Learning Studio offers limited customizations; a greater selection of algorithms is needed. If you want to go beyond the Microsoft Azure ecosystem, this may not be the best solution for you, as migration with other products can prove problematic. Conclusions Databricks and Azure Machine Learning Studio are both excellent, highly-regarded solutions. As our enterprise needs are very diverse, we found that each of these solutions offers attractive options that we can use simultaneously in successfully meeting our overall client needs.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Databricks' Lakehouse architecture has been most useful for us. The data governance has been absolutely efficient in between other kinds of solutions.""One of the features provides nice interactive clusters, or compute instances that you don't really need to manage often.""It is fast, it's scalable, and it does the job it needs to do.""This solution offers a lake house data concept that we have found exciting. We are able to have a large amount of data in a data lake and can manage all relational activities.""Databricks gives us the ability to build a lakehouse framework and do everything implicit to this type of database structure. We also like the ability to stream events. Databricks covers a broad spectrum, from reporting and machine learning to streaming events. It's important for us to have all these features in one platform.""Databricks has helped us have a good presence in data.""In the manufacturing industry, Databricks can be beneficial to use because of machine learning. It is useful for tasks, such as product analysis or predictive maintenance.""The technical support is good."

More Databricks Pros →

"Their web interface is good.""Scalability, in terms of running experiments concurrently is good. At max, I was able to run three different experiments concurrently.""It helps in building customized models, which are easy for clients to use​.​​""It is very easy to test different kinds of machine-learning algorithms with different parameters. You choose the algorithm, drag and drop to the workspace, and plug the dataset into this component.""It's good for citizen data scientists, but also, other people can use Python or .NET code.""The product supports open-source tools.""The interface is very intuitive.""Anyone who isn't a programmer his whole life can adopt it. All he needs is statistics and data analysis skills."

More Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio Pros →

Cons
"Databricks' performance when serving the data to an analytics tool isn't as good as Snowflake's.""Databricks is an analytics platform. It should offer more data science. It should have more features for data scientists to work with.""Implementation of Databricks is still very code heavy.""The Databricks cluster can be improved.""Instead of relying on a massive instance, the solution should offer micro partition levels. They're working on it, however, they need to implement it to help the solution run more effectively.""The solution could be improved by adding a feature that would make it more user-friendly for our team. The feature is simple, but it would be useful. Currently, our team is more familiar with the language R, but Databricks requires the use of Jupyter Notebooks which primarily supports Python. We have tried using RStudio, but it is not a fully integrated solution. To fully utilize Databricks, we have to use the Jupyter interface. One feature that would make it easier for our team to adopt the Jupyter interface would be the ability to select a specific variable or line of code and execute it within a cell. This feature is available in other Jupyter Notebooks outside of Databricks and in our own IDE, but it is not currently available within Databricks. If this feature were added, it would make the transition to using Databricks much smoother for our team.""Support for Microsoft technology and the compatibility with the .NET framework is somewhat missing.""The product cannot be integrated with a popular coding IDE."

More Databricks Cons →

"The data processor can pose a bit of a challenge, but the real complexity is determined by the skill of the implementation team.""In terms of data capabilities, if we compare it to Google Cloud's BigQuery, we find a difference. When fetching data from web traffic, Google can do a lot of processing with small queries or functions.""Overall, the icons in the solution could be improved to provide better guidance to users. Additionally, the setup process for the solution could be made easier.""The price could be improved.""I have found Databricks is a better solution because it has a lot of different cluster choices and better integration with MLflow, which is much easier to handle in a machine learning system.""I would like to see modules to handle Deep Learning frameworks.""Stability-wise, you may face certain problems when you fail to refresh the data in the solution.""They should have a desktop version to work on the platform."

More Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Whenever we want to find the actual costing, we have to send an email to Databricks, so having the information available on the internet would be helpful."
  • "I do not exactly know the costs, but one of our clients pays between $100 USD and $200 USD monthly."
  • "Licensing on site I would counsel against, as on-site hardware issues tend to really delay and slow down delivery."
  • "We find Databricks to be very expensive, although this improved when we found out how to shut it down at night."
  • "The pricing depends on the usage itself."
  • "I am based in South Africa, where it is expensive adapting to the cloud, and then there is the price for the tool itself."
  • "The price is okay. It's competitive."
  • "Databricks uses a price-per-use model, where you can use as much compute as you need."
  • More Databricks Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "To use MLS is fairly cheap. Even the paid account is something like $20/month, unless you are provisioning large numbers of VMs for a Hadoop cluster. The main MS makes money with this solution is forcing the user to deploy their model on REST API, and being charged each time the API is accessed. There are several pricing tiers for the API. If you do not use the API, then value of MLS is to create rapid experiments ($20/month). The resulting model is not exportable to use, thus you’ll have to recreate the algorithms in either R or Python, which is what I did. MLS results gave me a direction to work with, the actual work is mostly done in R and Python outside of MLS."
  • "When we got our first models and were ready for the user acceptance testing, our licensing fees were between €2,500 ($2,750 USD) and €3,000 ($3,300 USD) monthly."
  • "From a developer's perspective, I find the price of this solution high."
  • "The licensing cost is very cheap. It's less than $50 a month."
  • "There is a license required for this solution."
  • "I am paying for it following a pay-as-you-go. So, the more I use it, the more it costs."
  • "In terms of pricing, for any cloud solution, you should know the tricks of the trade and how to use it, otherwise, you'll end up paying a lot of money irrespective of the cloud provider, so at least for Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio pricing versus AWS, I would rate it three out of five, with one being the most expensive, and five being the cheapest. It could be cheaper, but you also have to be careful when choosing the plans, for example, consider the architecture and a lot of other factors before choosing your plan, if you don't want to end up paying more. If your cloud provider has an optimizer that seems to be available in every provider, that would keep alerting you in terms of resources not being used as much, then that would help you with budgeting."
  • "My team didn't deal with the licensing for Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio, so I'm unable to comment on pricing, but the money that was spent on the tool was worth it."
  • More Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Science Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Databricks gives you the option of working with several different languages, such as SQL, R, Scala, Apache Spark, or Python. It offers many different cluster choices and excellent integration with… more »
    Top Answer:We researched AWS SageMaker, but in the end, we chose Databricks Databricks is a Unified Analytics Platform designed to accelerate innovation projects. It is based on Spark so it is very fast. It… more »
    Top Answer:Databricks is an easy-to-set-up and versatile tool for data management, analysis, and business analytics. For analytics teams that have to interpret data to further the business goals of their… more »
    Top Answer:The learning curve is very low. Operationalizing the model is also very easy within the Azure ecosystem.
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten, with ten being very expensive. Not very expensive, not very cheap. It was on a yearly basis, and there were also usage-based costs.
    Top Answer:In terms of data capabilities, if we compare it to Google Cloud's BigQuery, we find a difference. When fetching data from web traffic, Google can do a lot of processing with small queries or… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    Views
    28,492
    Comparisons
    18,008
    Reviews
    47
    Average Words per Review
    441
    Rating
    8.3
    2nd
    Views
    14,211
    Comparisons
    11,608
    Reviews
    25
    Average Words per Review
    520
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Databricks Unified Analytics, Databricks Unified Analytics Platform, Redash
    Azure Machine Learning, MS Azure Machine Learning Studio
    Learn More
    Overview

    Databricks is an industry-leading data analytics platform which is a one-stop product for all data requirements. Databricks is made by the creators of Apache Spark, Delta Lake, ML Flow, and Koalas. It builds on these technologies to deliver a true lakehouse data architecture, making it a robust platform that is reliable, scalable, and fast. Databricks speeds up innovations by synthesizing storage, engineering, business operations, security, and data science.

    Databricks is integrated with Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services, and Google Cloud Platform. This enables users to easily manage a colossal amount of data and to continuously train and deploy machine learning models for AI applications. The platform handles all analytic deployments, ranging from ETL to models training and deployment.

    Databricks deciphers the complexities of processing data to empower data scientists, engineers, and analysts with a simple collaborative environment to run interactive and scheduled data analysis workloads. The program takes advantage of AI’s cost-effectivity, flexibility, and cloud storage.

    Databricks Key Features

    Some of Databricks key features include:

    • Cloud-native: Works well on any prominent cloud provider.
    • Data storage: Stores a broad range of data, including structured, unstructured, and streaming.
    • Self-governance: Built-in governance and security controls.
    • Flexibility: Flexible for small-scale jobs as well as running large-scale jobs like Big Data processing because it’s built from Spark and is specifically optimized for Cloud environments.
    • Data science tools: Production-ready data tooling, from engineering to BI, AI, and ML.
    • Familiar languages: While Databricks is Spark-based, it allows commonly used programming languages like R, SQL, Scala, and Python to be used.
    • Team sharing workspaces: Creates an environment that provides interactive workspaces for collaboration, which allow multiple members to collaborate for data model creation, machine learning, and data extraction.
    • Data source: Performs limitless Big Data analytics by connecting to Cloud providers AWS, Azure, and Google, as well as on-premises SQL servers, JSON and CSV.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Databricks stands out from its competitors for several reasons. Two striking features are its collaborative ability and its ability to streamline multiple programming languages.

    PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features. A Chief Research Officer in consumer goods writes, “We work with multiple people on notebooks and it enables us to work collaboratively in an easy way without having to worry about the infrastructure. I think the solution is very intuitive, very easy to use. And that's what you pay for.”

    A business intelligence coordinator in construction notes, “The capacity of use of the different types of coding is valuable. Databricks also has good performance because it is running in spark extra storage, meaning the performance and the capacity use different kinds of codes.”

    An Associate Manager who works in consultancy mentions, “The technology that allows us to write scripts within the solution is extremely beneficial. If I was, for example, able to script in SQL, R, Scala, Apache Spark, or Python, I would be able to use my knowledge to make a script in this solution. It is very user-friendly and you can also process the records and validation point of view. The ability to migrate from one environment to another is useful.”

    Azure Machine Learning is a cloud predictive analytics service that makes it possible to quickly create and deploy predictive models as analytics solutions.

    It has everything you need to create complete predictive analytics solutions in the cloud, from a large algorithm library, to a studio for building models, to an easy way to deploy your model as a web service. Quickly create, test, operationalize, and manage predictive models.

    Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Will Help You:

    • Rapidly build and train models
    • Operationalize at scale
    • Deliver responsible solutions
    • Innovate on a more secure hybrid platform

    With Microsoft Azure Machine Learning You Can:

    • Prepare data: Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio offers data labeling, data preparation, and datasets.
    • Build and train models: Includes notebooks, Visual Studio Code and Github, Automated ML, Compute instance, a drag-and-drop designer, open-source libraries and frameworks, customizable dashboards, and experiments
    • Validate and deploy: Manage endpoints, automate machine learning workflows (pipeline CI/CD), optimize models, access pre-built container images, share and track models and data, train and deploy models across multi-cloud and on-premises.
    • Manage and monitor: Track, log, and analyze data, models, and resources; Detect drift and maintain model accuracy; Trace ML artifacts for compliance; Apply quota management and automatic shutdown; Leverage built-in and custom policies for compliance management; Utilize continuous monitoring with Azure Security Center.

    Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Features:

    • Easy & flexible building interface: Execute your machine learning development through the Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio using drag-and-drop components that minimize the code development and straightforward configuration of properties. By being so flexible, the solution also helps build, test ,and generate advanced analytics based on the data.
    • Wide range of supported algorithms: Configuration is simple and easy because Microsoft Azure ML offers readily available well-known algorithms. There is also no limit in importing training data, and the solution enables you to fine-tune your data easily, saving money and time and helping you generate more revenue.
    • Easy implementation of web services: Simply drag and drop your data sets and algorithms, and link them together to implement web services. It only requires one click to create and publish the web service, which can be used from any device by passing valid credentials.
    • Great documentation: Microsoft Azure provides full stacks of documentation, such as tutorials, quick starts, references, and many other resources that help you understand how to easily build, manage, deploy, and access machine learning solutions effectively.

    Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Benefits:

    • It is fully integrated with Python and R SDKs.
    • It has an updated drag-and-drop interface, generally known as Azure Machine Learning Designer.
    • It supports MLPipelines, where you can build flexible and modular pipelines to automate workflows.
    • It supports multiple model formats depending upon the job type.
    • It has automated model training and hyperparameter tuning with code-first and no-code options.
    • It supports data labeling projects.

    Reviews from Real Users:

    "The ability to do the templating and be able to transfer it so that I can easily do multiple types of models and data mining is a valuable aspect of this solution. You only have to set up the flows, the templates, and the data once and then you can make modifications and test different segmentations throughout.” - Channing S.l, Owner at Channing Stowell Associates

    "The most valuable feature is the knowledge bank, which allows us to ask questions and the AI will automatically pull the pre-prescribed responses.” - Chris P., Tech Lead at a tech services company

    "The UI is very user-friendly and the AI is easy to use.” - Mikayil B., CRM Consultant at a computer software company

    "The solution is very fast and simple for a data science solution.” - Omar A., Big Data & Cloud Manager at a tech services company

    Sample Customers
    Elsevier, MyFitnessPal, Sharethrough, Automatic Labs, Celtra, Radius Intelligence, Yesware
    Walgreens Boots Alliance, Schneider Electric, BP
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Retailer9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Healthcare Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise59%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Databricks vs. Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks vs. Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Databricks is ranked 1st in Data Science Platforms with 78 reviews while Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is ranked 2nd in Data Science Platforms with 50 reviews. Databricks is rated 8.2, while Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Databricks writes "A nice interface with good features for turning off clusters to save on computing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio writes "Good support for Azure services in pipelines, but deploying outside of Azure is difficult". Databricks is most compared with Amazon SageMaker, Informatica PowerCenter, Dataiku Data Science Studio, Dremio and Azure Stream Analytics, whereas Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio is most compared with Google Vertex AI, Azure OpenAI, TensorFlow, Google Cloud AI Platform and Dataiku Data Science Studio. See our Databricks vs. Microsoft Azure Machine Learning Studio report.

    See our list of best Data Science Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.