We performed a comparison between Delinea Secret Server and NetIQ Privileged Account Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."The surveillance is most valuable."
"I really like the zero trust piece."
"Delinea's network integration is the most useful. For example, I use a Check Point firewall connect to SmartConsole, so I need to do a lot of configuration in Delinea Secret Server. Native integration with Check Point is valuable. You can also go download whatever API you need from the cloud, whether you're using Check Point, Palo Alto, etc. Enriched discovery is another good feature. If you are dealing with several kinds of systems, you can see which system requires privileged access to my network."
"There has been no downtime this year."
"The secret template, password rotation, and recording sessions are the most valuable."
"Provides us with the ability to control access [to secrets] by groups."
"The discovery engine is really robust and flexible. It had some session management features that are better compared to some other vendors. Overall the GUI is very good and straightforward to operate compared to other solutions. For example, CyberArk and Hitachi tend to be hard to navigate."
"The "App to App" feature has been most impactful. It allows secure communication between applications without requiring direct user access, which is crucial for several applications."
"Most valuable feature is the credential vault."
"The setup for this solution is complex. I'm not going to lie, you need a specialized system security engineer to deploy it."
"The initial setup and deployment can be cumbersome. It's not an easy process."
"They could improve the container platform and SPO."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"We faced some upgrade issues, especially during the management and administration parts. I found it less straightforward than on many other platforms, even outside password managers."
"There could be tweaks here and there. For example, instead of going to one main function to do this and another main function to do that, the solution could remap the user interface so that a person only has to go through one function. The way that function branches off should make a bit more sense."
"We always ask for partner enablement, which is more like a soft requirement rather than a product requirement. It would be great if they can provide us deeper knowledge of their products for integration."
"In terms of what could be improved, the whole thing with distributed engines, et cetera, is a little bit tricky."
"The user interface could be improved, it's not that good,"
Earn 20 points
Delinea Secret Server is ranked 2nd in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 47 reviews while NetIQ Privileged Account Manager is ranked 27th in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Delinea Secret Server is rated 8.2, while NetIQ Privileged Account Manager is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Delinea Secret Server writes "Effective for password rotation policies triggered by audit requirements, it helps maintain compliance standards and seamless integration with third-party tools ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetIQ Privileged Account Manager writes "Has a useful credential vault feature but the user interface needs to be improved". Delinea Secret Server is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, IBM Security Secret Server and ManageEngine PAM360, whereas NetIQ Privileged Account Manager is most compared with .
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
