Dell PowerEdge M vs HPE BladeSystem comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Dell Technologies Logo
3,593 views|2,407 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
3,703 views|2,702 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Dell PowerEdge M and HPE BladeSystem based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Blade Servers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Dell PowerEdge M vs. HPE BladeSystem Report (Updated: March 2024).
771,581 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The networking features for administration and working with the server are valuable.""The solution offers remarkable flexibility, reliability, and extensive software support.""The initial setup is easy.""It is easy to manage by an administrator and we can spend valuable time on other IT issues.""The initial setup is straightforward.""The solution's most valuable features are centralized monitoring and management and the ease of upgrading firmware.""The solution is made with high-quality hardware.""The tool's most valuable features are high availability and scalability. Its integration is easy."

More Dell PowerEdge M Pros →

"I like the stability.""They are reliable, and they hardly break down. They are fast, and they serve us very well.""The technical support is good.""The solution has good performance.""The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.""I have noticed that the solution does provide a very good ROI for companies.""One of the most valuable features I have found to be the enclosure. It is really easy to manage and everything is integrated. You are able to upgrade the software quite easily.""Modularity is a key feature that provides energy saving ."

More HPE BladeSystem Pros →

Cons
"More interconnections with third party equipment and limited I/O selection.""Dell PowerEdge M lacks GPU nodes and doesn't have a direct solution for GPUs.""I would like to have additional HPC and AI capabilities on general Dell PowerEdge servers.""The set up is complex""Technical support is not good.""In terms of improvement, it should also offer a hyper-converged option.""There is room for improvement in scalability.""The firmware updates for the product need improvement."

More Dell PowerEdge M Cons →

"​It is really stable, however the motherboard sometimes crashes.""HPE BladeSystem can improve proactive monitoring.""The scalability is limited because you only have a 16-server by chassis.""The latest version of this system is called Synergy from HPE, and it comes with more advanced features. This is currently the most advanced solution available in the market. One of its key features is its energy efficiency, which optimizes energy usage.""I would prefer to have changes in the compatibility of the blade servers with the new ones designed by HPE, as the top team's version does not have it.""Currently, in the case of a disk failure there is a need to remove the whole bay and as a result, to disconnect all the other disks.""If you compare it with Lenovo systems, the pricing is too high.""​Storage capacity could be enhanced."

More HPE BladeSystem Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It was budget friendly."
  • "If we would not have gone with the vendor we might have been charged unnecessarily for packages we did not need."
  • "Dell PowerEdge M price is comparable to other solutions but cheaper than IBM. However, the IBM solution is a higher grade solution whereas Dell PowerEdge M is a medium-level solution."
  • "The pricing of PowerEdge Next is higher than it was before."
  • "The product is neither expensive nor cheap. It is manageable for medium enterprises as well."
  • "The solution's pricing is slightly higher."
  • "The product is budget-friendly. The initial cost for each server was around 10,000 euros. It's a standard price, not too high or too low."
  • More Dell PowerEdge M Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Their licensing program is pretty simple."
  • "With regards to the prices, they need to adapt to the current needs of the country."
  • "The prices for the HPE Virtual Connect Modules are expensive compared to other I/O Modules available."
  • "Add OneView and ILO advanced to the base product. Don’t adjust the price, but just include them."
  • "​The price could be cheaper."
  • "The chassis itself, with no blade server inside, so expensive. The C7000 model costs around $100,000."
  • "It is not expensive, really, in this class of server products."
  • "It is expensive. There are no additional costs. We are able to get good discounts anyway from HPE, but if the price can come down, we'll be happy."
  • More HPE BladeSystem Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    771,581 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution's most valuable features are centralized monitoring and management and the ease of upgrading firmware.
    Top Answer:The solution's pricing is slightly higher. However, we don't require an additional license for it. The solution's pricing depends on the customer's connectivity requirements, whether 10G, 25G, or 100… more »
    Top Answer:Cisco UCS X-series provides a GPU node and compute node in a single chassis. Dell PowerEdge M lacks GPU nodes and doesn't have a direct solution for GPUs.
    Top Answer:For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because it… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.
    Ranking
    4th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    3,593
    Comparisons
    2,407
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    479
    Rating
    8.4
    2nd
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    3,703
    Comparisons
    2,702
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    402
    Rating
    8.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem, HP BladeSystem
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Dell PowerEdge M-Series blade servers address the challenges of an evolving IT environment by delivering leading enterprise classfeatures and functionality. The M-Series delivers a unique array of options configured to meet the needs of your IT environment both now and in the future.

    • Multiple blade form-factor choices.
    • Long life cycle providing better life cycle management and improved TCO.
    • Modular I/O switches for future scalability.
    • Breakthrough fan technologies for reduction in power consumption.
    • Configuration management via chassis management controller.
    • Persistent MAC/WWN/iSCSI addresses in a switch-agnostic environment.
    HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.
    Sample Customers
    Newport City Homes, Neuroblastoma and Medulloblastoma Translational Research Consortium (NMTRC), Georgian College, AgreeYa Solutions, IIHT Cloud Solutions, Arizona State University, AudienceScience, University of the Incarnate Word (UIW), The Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Holy Cross School
    EMIS Health
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Healthcare Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Insurance Company9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Dell PowerEdge M vs. HPE BladeSystem
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Dell PowerEdge M vs. HPE BladeSystem and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    771,581 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Dell PowerEdge M is ranked 4th in Blade Servers with 15 reviews while HPE BladeSystem is ranked 2nd in Blade Servers with 134 reviews. Dell PowerEdge M is rated 8.4, while HPE BladeSystem is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Dell PowerEdge M writes "Average pricing and good feature sets but is complex to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Very reliable, expands well, and is pretty simple to set up". Dell PowerEdge M is most compared with HPE Synergy, HPE Superdome X, Cisco UCS B-Series, Super Micro SuperBlade and HPE NonStop, whereas HPE BladeSystem is most compared with HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series, Super Micro SuperBlade and HPE Superdome X. See our Dell PowerEdge M vs. HPE BladeSystem report.

    See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.