We performed a comparison between DxEnterprise and Windows Server Failover Clustering based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two High Availability Clustering solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.More Windows Server Failover Clustering Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
DxEnterprise is ranked 6th in High Availability Clustering while Windows Server Failover Clustering is ranked 1st in High Availability Clustering with 8 reviews. DxEnterprise is rated 8.6, while Windows Server Failover Clustering is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of DxEnterprise writes "Learning curve when moving from PolyServe is very low. I would refrain from using DxTransfer for moving databases & jobs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Server Failover Clustering writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that is affordable and easy to deploy". DxEnterprise is most compared with , whereas Windows Server Failover Clustering is most compared with IBM PowerHA System Mirror, Veritas InfoScale Availability, DRBD and HPE Serviceguard. See our DxEnterprise vs. Windows Server Failover Clustering report.
See our list of best High Availability Clustering vendors.
We monitor all High Availability Clustering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.