Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Figma Logo
21,442 views|20,181 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Lucid Software Logo
7,535 views|6,771 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Figma and Lucidspark based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Figma, Miro, Lucid Software and others in Visual Collaboration Platforms.
To learn more, read our detailed Visual Collaboration Platforms Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The way you can create templates is probably most helpful because it gives us a way to very quickly play around and test ideas and different types of layouts.""File sharing is easy."

More Figma Pros →

"How easy it is to use is the best feature.""The most valuable feature is the live, interactive whiteboarding. For brainstorming high-level ideas and concepts it's like Visio but much better, because it's online. Collaboration for process is much easier.""We specifically sought to aggregate data and brainstorming and then to look at the ideas that seemed to have the most value. We were able to prioritize and identify productivity issues and move forward. Being a continuous improvement expert, I tend to use very specific tools for prioritizing, but the tools in Lucidspark did help us do that on a qualitative basis, very effectively.""We have used this solution for remote or virtual brainstorming sessions. We're a 100% remote company and therefore having that capability is important.""The fact that you can have multiple users working at the same time is a really big plus. The fact that we can all collaborate in real-time is a very useful aspect.""My workshops have seen a much higher engagement. In the past, maybe ten or twenty percent of my clients would normally participate. With Lucidspark being involved, I see almost 90% engagement of everyone in the room, because they're required to add something.""The most valuable feature is the different ways that you can build out the charting and the mind maps. There are various different templates that are included in the program.""I like the fact that Lucidspark has got all these templates that we can use."

More Lucidspark Pros →

Cons
"Sometimes the prototype view menu gets in the way of navigation, especially if the prototype has a menu at the top, and most of the time it does.""One of the areas for improvement is the onboarding experience. When you first starting using Figma, it can be a little confusing. It would be useful to have some guidance and direction."

More Figma Cons →

"Using my iPad, it seems clunky and isn't as responsive as my PC.""One thing that I actually found difficult to do was to introduce video calls. Managing calls and the whiteboards and being all remote is difficult.""I would like for the whiteboard to have the ability to be expanded. It doesn't have the ability to be a continuous page so that you don't have to erase things.""There's a little bit of latency with the collaboration bit. Overall it's not quite as fast as Google docs, however, it's really close.""There is room for improvement with the user interface. It almost feels "uncooked." It sometimes feels like a prototype rather than the real thing.""It has not affected the productivity of our working and brainstorming sessions too much.""There should be a feature for changing the color of the background, borders, etc. Such a feature will make the flowcharts more attractive.""Some parts where the arrows flow tend to flow in a strange direction where you want to drag it to, and it requires a lot of adjusting here and there. It's just the flow of the arrow sometimes it gets a little tricky, and then when you move something else, it gets wonky, and then you have to go back and fix it up. That's the only thing that needs improvement."

More Lucidspark Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "There is room for improvement in terms of the cost. It should all be bundled together. It's becoming like a Microsoft, where you have to buy all the different version features separately. It should just all be bundled with one price."
  • "The licensing is a fair price. We mainly have single users. We chose not to do the team user because of the cost. We didn't see a need for that at this point. We have talked to Lucidchart and Lucidspark salesmen often about that."
  • "It's a very reasonable $8 a month. That makes it really accessible and helps it fill a pretty significant need for virtual collaboration. Just about every leadership team member that I've talked to said, 'Oh, well, that's cheap, just go buy it.'"
  • "It is not cost-prohibitive. It is well worth it, but we are also a small team. We are definitely planning on having it as part of our onboarding for everyone, but I haven't looked at the pricing for an enterprise level or large set of employees."
  • "I personally had a hard time getting the licenses sorted out. In the organizational license, the whole process took a lot of time. Personally, I feel that the licensing could be done much better on that front."
  • "It would be better if I didn't use Lucidspark at all and just used Illustrator and Photoshop, but it doesn't make sense for my projects to do that. It would remove a tremendous amount of steps, but it would cost a tremendous amount of money."
  • "One must pay extra if he wishes to have a higher level product."
  • "I don't think that the cost is ever something that I considered. It has always been worth it to pay a small payment and help everyone with their tasks. It has definitely helped me become more organized. I don't think that the cost has been a barrier at all, and it is worth it to be able to pay for it."
  • More Lucidspark Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Visual Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Windows Server integrates well with all Microsoft and many other mainstream solutions Building a Failover Cluster is comparatively much easier in Windows Server than with other solutions. We really… more »
    Top Answer:The way you can create templates is probably most helpful because it gives us a way to very quickly play around and test ideas and different types of layouts.
    Top Answer:One of the areas for improvement is the onboarding experience. When you first starting using Figma, it can be a little confusing. It would be useful to have some guidance and direction.
    Top Answer:Hi @Krista Thompson ​ - Yes, LucidSpark is a much more nimble and, in some ways, user-friendly tool than LucidChart. LucidSpark is designed to do a better job managing multiple users participating… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    21,442
    Comparisons
    20,181
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    258
    Rating
    10.0
    Views
    7,535
    Comparisons
    6,771
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,237
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Miro logo
    Compared 88% of the time.
    Lucidchart logo
    Compared 4% of the time.
    MURAL logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Jamboard logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    Lucidchart logo
    Compared 69% of the time.
    Miro logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    MURAL logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Jamboard logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Figma is a cloud-based design tool that allows teams to collaborate in real-time on creating, prototyping, and iterating digital designs. With its intuitive interface and powerful features, Figma has become popular among designers and design teams. Figma's cloud-based nature ensures that designs are always up-to-date and accessible from anywhere. This makes it easy for teams to collaborate remotely or across different locations, fostering a more efficient and flexible workflow.

    One of the key features of Figma is its real-time collaboration capabilities. Multiple team members can work on a design simultaneously, making it easy to gather feedback, make changes, and iterate quickly. This eliminates the need for time-consuming file sharing and version control, streamlining the design process.

    Figma also offers a wide range of design tools and features to help designers bring their ideas to life. From vector editing and prototyping to design components and libraries, Figma provides everything designers need to create high-quality, interactive designs. Its robust design system allows for easy reuse of design elements, ensuring consistency across projects.

    Another advantage of Figma is its cross-platform compatibility. It works seamlessly on both Mac and Windows operating systems, making it accessible to designers regardless of their preferred platform. Additionally, Figma offers a web-based version, allowing users to access their designs from any device with an internet connection.

    Lucidspark is a virtual whiteboard where teams can bring their best ideas to light. Collaborate in real time, no matter where you are. Lucidspark helps people organize notes and scribbles and turn them into presentation-ready concepts. When it’s time for next steps, teams can develop workflows and process documents to turn ideas into reality. Features include: integrations, infinite canvas, sticky notes, freehand drawing, chat, templates, timer, voting, and more.

    With Lucidspark, you can not only brainstorm ideas as a team but then refine and organize those ideas to drive action. Features like assisted grouping and Lucidchart import/export help users turn ideas into plans and strategies.

    Lucidspark is part of the Lucid suite, the only visual collaboration suite that helps teams see and build the future from idea to reality. Users can start ideating in Lucidspark and then seamlessly move to Lucidchart and Lucidchart Cloud Insights to complete the full project lifecycle and make their ideas a reality.

    Sample Customers
    Uber, Zoom, Deliveroo
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Educational Organization7%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company15%
    University15%
    Renewables & Environment Company10%
    Media Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Healthcare Company8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business56%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise31%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Visual Collaboration Platforms
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Figma, Miro, Lucid Software and others in Visual Collaboration Platforms. Updated: May 2024.
    770,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Figma is ranked 1st in Visual Collaboration Platforms with 2 reviews while Lucidspark is ranked 4th in Visual Collaboration Platforms with 33 reviews. Figma is rated 10.0, while Lucidspark is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Figma writes "Project sharing solution used to visually present ideas for different features and makes it possible to create templates". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Lucidspark writes "Facilitates a lot of the productivity of our working and brainstorming sessions". Figma is most compared with Miro, Lucidchart, MURAL and Jamboard, whereas Lucidspark is most compared with Lucidchart, Miro, MURAL and Jamboard.

    See our list of best Visual Collaboration Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Visual Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.