We performed a comparison between FlutterFlow and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Low-Code Development Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."FlutterFlow offers a lot, but one feature that really helps me is the debugging features that allow me to test everything on the spot. This is really helpful."
"The most valuable features of FlutterFlow are the integrations and workflows."
"The most valuable feature is the time-to-market because you can make apps pretty fast."
"The support is the most valuable feature."
"I have found the technical support to be helpful."
"In Microsoft PowerApps the most valuable features are the fully customizable design that we can control everything that we would like to control. For example, the integration between Microsoft and third-party services through pre-built connectors, and the functionality to create custom connectors."
"The model that allows you to establish flow automation is getting a lot of traction from the customer side. It offers a lot of flexibility."
"The solution is excellent at figuring how to build an application in three months. It makes it very quick and easy."
"Time to market is most valuable because you can make apps pretty fast. It also has pretty good integration."
"I would say that the most valuable features are the user interface, navigation, and business routes."
"There is room for improvement in advanced functionality so it could cater to more complex app development needs."
"The UI components could be more standardized. Sometimes, for certain properties, I have to search more than I do with other platforms. With other platforms, once you know one, you know all. But with FlutterFlow, sometimes you have to look around for what you need."
"Can be improved to cater to complex developments."
"The solution should move to the next step in its maturity model and include mobile versions for Android and iOS."
"Integration with databases and other tools needs to be improved."
"The set up of the solution could be simpler."
"One of the major problems with it is what PowerApps calls the delegation warning. Regardless of what platform, data source, et cetera, that you're using, you can't retrieve more than 2000 records."
"One area where the solution lacks is the limited size of the database it offers its users."
"The area where this product can be improved is the documentation. When we get stuck it's with the documentation when we are not able to find the codes we need."
"The stability of this solution could be better."
FlutterFlow is ranked 17th in Low-Code Development Platforms with 2 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Low-Code Development Platforms with 77 reviews. FlutterFlow is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of FlutterFlow writes "Simplifies integrations, accelerates development timelines, and offers a good MVP". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". FlutterFlow is most compared with Mendix, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Unqork. See our FlutterFlow vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.
See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.