We performed a comparison between Forescout Platform and Nozomi Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IoT Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of the Forescout Platform is the large capacity it can handle. Additionally, the interface of the platform is good."
"The user management has been very easy for the most part."
"Ease of deployment There's a great support team that becomes actively engaged whenever we encounter issues. Their technical support is amazing. Good documentation is available. The product is stable. The solution is highly scalable. I recommend using the solution because it gives verified control over the environment. It has a great visibility feature."
"Forescout Platform has granular features and one of the most impressive features is the agentless feature."
"This is clearly the best product for the NAC use cases in this field for Forescout."
"It allows for good detection of all the vendor products we have on-site."
"The most valuable feature of the Forescout Platform it's highly customizable and flexible."
"The most valuable features of the Forescout Platform are NAC for sharing, Network Access Control, and port sharing of the devices."
"Provides security for our operational technology environment for OT and IoT."
"The feature I like best is its stability."
"The most valuable feature of Nozomi Networks is its security features."
"Other solutions have TACACS+, but Forescout does not. In the next release, I would like to see Forescout have accounting."
"The system controls could be better."
"They should improve features related to IT security. ForeScout should analyze behavior to see if the behavior is malicious behavior and block this device. They should develop the ability to analyze the behavior of the device in my environment."
"Definitely, having more third-party integration would be an improvement."
"Can be expensive if it's only being used for one feature."
"The solution needs more definitive pricing. The costs are hard to nail down."
"We experienced some detection issues when checking compliance for the Sophos agent."
"The solution could always improve by adding more features to make it more robust."
"It should support more programmable logic controllers (PLCs)."
"Proof of concept could be improved. It could be more tangible to the customer and the end users to have a video presentation or something like that."
"The solution should include an integration library."
Forescout Platform is ranked 1st in IoT Security with 69 reviews while Nozomi Networks is ranked 2nd in IoT Security with 3 reviews. Forescout Platform is rated 8.4, while Nozomi Networks is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Forescout Platform writes "We can go granular on each endpoint, quarantine non-compliant machines, and target vulnerabilities through scripting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nozomi Networks writes "Has good security features and can be used for OT visibility". Forescout Platform is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Armis and Tenable Security Center, whereas Nozomi Networks is most compared with Claroty Platform, Tenable OT Security, Dragos, Armis and Microsoft Defender for IoT. See our Forescout Platform vs. Nozomi Networks report.
See our list of best IoT Security vendors.
We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.