We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiClient and Golden Frog VyprVPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiClient is its performance."
"It's very stable."
"Starting from FortiGate and from the EMS server, you have to begin at the endpoint, and that's the most useful thing about using FortiClient."
"The solution's TNA feature blocks devices from entering the network that do not meet compliance protocols."
"Remote connectivity is its most valuable feature."
"The solution is very scalable. It just depends on the number of licenses an organization has. The enterprise management console is related to the number of clients, and the client interface itself is free to download."
"It has a very easy-to-use interface. It has ease of management, and all the modules are there. SKUs are also easily identifiable. Whatever is required in the firewall is already there in it. It's very advanced, and analytics reporting is very good. They also have cloud reporting. You get all the services that are available for your device in the cloud. You just have to subscribe. It's very easy. There's a lot of demand for this solution because it's an all-in-one solution. The throughput is very high."
"The ability to reroute traffic from the user, connecting you to the internet rather than passing through our network area, is very useful."
"l like the high download speed of the solution. Of course, it depends on which country you're using, but most countries are fast, and the solution doesn't limit your internet speed very much."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The user interface could be more inviting."
"We've had some problems with having to remove the current version and either reinstalling an old version or updating to the new one."
"One area for improvement in FortiClient is the speed of connectivity."
"There is lagging in some of the authentication tools to support the newer versions, this is happening because they are not supported."
"The solution can improve by adding new remote console or endpoint features to make the solution easier to use."
"The licensing feature of the product requires improvement since whenever the license expires, the tool logs out its users automatically, irrespective of whether they are on the network or not, which can be problematic for me."
"I would like to see endpoint detection and response included."
"More integration would be beneficial."
"The problem with the solution is that most of the time, it uses a certain IP address that does not change much. If I'm using a different country, like Germany, it still uses the same IP address, and the downside is that this doesn't work well with services like Netflix because Netflix realizes that I'm using a VPN."
Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 86 reviews while Golden Frog VyprVPN is ranked 28th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review. Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0, while Golden Frog VyprVPN is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Golden Frog VyprVPN writes "A stable solution that is easy to set up and offers high download speeds". Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Fortinet FortiEDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, whereas Golden Frog VyprVPN is most compared with .
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.