We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiClient and Sangfor SSL VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"It is a fantastic product. Its overall security is valuable. We are very impressed with the web filtering and the application firewall it provides."
"The Fortinet FortiClient is simple to use."
"Fortinet FortiClient offers a vulnerability test feature, allowing us to monitor end-user devices. This includes ensuring necessary updates, such as Windows updates, are not overlooked."
"You can scale the product."
"It works well and the performance is good."
"From Forticlient, the EMS, the central management is easy to use."
"The solution is easy to configure and manage."
"Secure and easy connect is the most valuable feature. It is a reliable solution, and it works."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of the product is very easy."
"Sangfor SSL VPN provides secure encryption for communication."
"Sangfor SSL VPN is a secure and user-friendly solution."
"The platform is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is our ability to limit access by user, IP address, or MAC address."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Technical support is awful. Their online response time is not prompt. They should not respond after four or five days. Their support guys are not competent enough. Small issues are taking time."
"The connectivity could be improved."
"The price could also use improvement."
"The user interface on the central server could be improved."
"The product's performance and pricing could be better."
"Cloud services are very expensive for us."
"The solution could improve by providing analytics or detailed reports."
"The features of Fortinet FortiClient could be improved."
"Sangfor SSL VPN should provide advanced protection against ransomware and better data analysis."
"No solution is perfect, so there is room for improvement."
"In redundancy mode, when the firewall goes off, the VPN should be able to connect to the secondary firewall automatically."
"I think Sangfor can provide a web-based SSL VPN version."
"The technical support team takes around two months to respond to queries. It is very time-consuming."
Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 86 reviews while Sangfor SSL VPN is ranked 17th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 5 reviews. Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0, while Sangfor SSL VPN is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sangfor SSL VPN writes "A secure and user-friendly solution that is simple to implement and configure". Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Fortinet FortiEDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, whereas Sangfor SSL VPN is most compared with Sangfor EasyConnect, Peplink SpeedFusion, AWS Direct Connect, Hillstone E-Series and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM). See our Fortinet FortiClient vs. Sangfor SSL VPN report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
