We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiNAC and Ivanti NAC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Fortinet FortiNAC has good user account customization."
"It is a good product."
"Version 9.1 has been an improvement on previous versions. It's a good solution for SMB."
"The tool provides us with a list of devices that tries to connect to our network. It offers us a lot of network visibility."
"There are some features that are working well."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiNAC are access control, automation, artificial intelligence, analysis, and security, and it is a unified solution. You can combine a lot of features within the solution."
"Fortinet FortiNAC is both scalable and stable."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the user-friendliness, the graphical interface, and the technical support. The interface is very nice and the customization is good."
"Integration with other vendors is possible."
"Ivanti NAC's most valuable feature is reasonable pricing."
"The profiler option allows me to see every detail in a systematic manner from a switch. I can choose the switch and I can see the port NAC address and time."
"Keeping the hard disk on the one series will be easier for the distributor and will keep the prices lower for the customer."
"The technical support is bad. We've had to escalate to Tier 2 and Tier 3. My customer relationship manager on the other side of this has stopped returning phone calls and emails, because there has been such a constant back and forth."
"This solution could be more agile."
"Its technical support needs improvement."
"The platform must enable troubleshooting."
"There could be better integration with legacy equipment. It integrates perfectly with all Fortinet solutions, but if you look at other third-party integrations—not on the networking part; but more on the security infrastructure part—it's more limited."
"The training documentation needs to be more transparent."
"The training from Fortinet FortiNAC could improve. Fortinet has to plan for better training for its partners. Additionally, device management should have more integration with other devices, such as new and third-party devices."
"The documentation needs to be improved. There are a lot of details that are missed which makes it confusing."
"The product's performance needs improvement."
"At some point, the server got cached and we faced several issues that impacted our customers. We would like to have this resolved."
Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 4th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 43 reviews while Ivanti NAC is ranked 13th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 7.6, while Ivanti NAC is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti NAC writes "Affordable product with an easy initial setup process". Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and ThreatLocker Protect, whereas Ivanti NAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass and Forescout Platform. See our Fortinet FortiNAC vs. Ivanti NAC report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.