We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiNAC and macmon Network Access Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There are some features that are working well."
"The FortiNAC features I found the most valuable are security and the ability to consolidate wireless networks."
"When it works, it's great. It keeps things off the network which are supposed to be off the network."
"The solution is good at giving a deep dive into each product. It tells you, for example, what is connected to the network. It gives us good reporting tools."
"All the features of Fortinet FortiNAC are valuable."
"With FortiNAC, we don't need to configure the mass client site or access points. For example, we don't need to configure the switching site for a client's site. With Persistent Agent, it makes it much easier."
"Compliance checks are a good feature. Compliance check is for windows updates and for antivirus updates, etc."
"The product's most valuable feature is its ability to protect devices connected to network service."
"The API is a great way to get information from other tools."
"The ease of connecting with the client is valuable for me."
"We use it with our Cisco switches so we can see which switch it is actually connected to."
"The automation in Fortinet FortiNAC could improve."
"The implementation process needs improvement. Right now, it's somewhat complicated. They could create some templates to facilitate implementation. Right now everything is done manually, and it just takes a really long time at the initial setup."
"This solution could be more agile."
"Admin UI could be better matched and easier to use; it cannot work as a RADIUS server."
"Fortinet FortiNAC's device compatibility could be improved, particularly for VoIP devices."
"The product could be more user-friendly in terms of GUI."
"Our users have been asking for simpler documentation and training materials to facilitate the deployment process."
"The solution's licensing price should be improved."
"The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly."
"The solution must allow users to filter files based on dates."
"The service macmon offers is already great."
More macmon Network Access Control Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 4th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 43 reviews while macmon Network Access Control is ranked 9th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 7.6, while macmon Network Access Control is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor". On the other hand, the top reviewer of macmon Network Access Control writes "A robust solution that provides protection to effectively control the access to your network". Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and Ruckus Cloudpath, whereas macmon Network Access Control is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Forescout Platform. See our Fortinet FortiNAC vs. macmon Network Access Control report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.