• Home
  • GNU GNATS vs. IBM Rational ClearQuest

GNU GNATS vs IBM Rational ClearQuest comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GNU Logo
GNU GNATS
22 views|8 comparisons
IBM Logo
IBM Rational ClearQuest
Read 4 IBM Rational ClearQuest reviews
25 views|16 comparisons
80% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
IBM Rational ClearQuest vs. Panaya Test Dynamix
May 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GNU GNATS and IBM Rational ClearQuest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Adminitrack, Panaya and others in Defect Tracking.
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Rational ClearQuest vs. Panaya Test Dynamix Report (Updated: May 2024).
Download the complete report
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use GNU GNATS?
Anonymous User
Tracks change requests, problems, and physical asset management. I would like to see data type for floating point...
The solution we’re providing our client required the implementation of the workflow feature to complement their process. It allows us to assign... Read more →
Ranking
5th
out of 8 in Defect Tracking
Views
22
Comparisons
8
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
1st
out of 8 in Defect Tracking
Views
25
Comparisons
16
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
IBM Rational ClearQuest vs. Panaya Test Dynamix
May 2024
Free Report: IBM Rational ClearQuest vs. Panaya Test Dynamix
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational ClearQuest vs. Panaya Test Dynamix and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
GNATS
Rational ClearQuest
Learn More
GNU
IBM
Overview
GNU GNATS is a set of tools for tracking bugs reported by users to a central site. It allows problem report management and communication with users via various means. GNATS stores all the information about problem reports in its databases and provides tools for querying, editing, and maintenance of the databases. Thanks to its architecture, GNATS is not bound to a single user interface - it can be used via command line, e-mail, Emacs, or a network daemon, usually used with a Web interface. Together with the fact that all GNATS databases and configuration can be stored in plain text files, it allows easy use and provides good flexibility. Basically, if the GNATS tools do not provide everything you need, you can add your own additional utilities using standard GNU tools.

IBM Rational ClearQuest is a fully customizable database workflow application development and production system. It provides flexible change and defect tracking, customizable processes, near real-time reporting and lifecycle traceability for better visibility and control of the software development lifecycle. IBM Rational ClearQuest provides scalable, multiplatform support to any size organization so you can continue to customize processes as your development needs evolve.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Atos SE, STM, Regence BlueCross BlueShield
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company22%
Computer Software Company11%
Government8%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise69%

GNU GNATS is ranked 5th in Defect Tracking while IBM Rational ClearQuest is ranked 1st in Defect Tracking. GNU GNATS is rated 0.0, while IBM Rational ClearQuest is rated 7.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational ClearQuest writes "Tracks change requests, problems, and physical asset management. I would like to see data type for floating point numbers. ". GNU GNATS is most compared with , whereas IBM Rational ClearQuest is most compared with Jira, IBM Rational ClearCase, HCL Compass and IBM Rational Synergy.

See our list of best Defect Tracking vendors.

We monitor all Defect Tracking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.