We performed a comparison between Goliath Performance Monitor and Splunk Enterprise Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."I like that it not only has the ability to monitor but that it can do a lot of specific Citrix monitoring."
"Offers a diversity of features."
"Splunk is extremely flexible, which allows us to create custom visualizations along with other customizations."
"Splunk has a wide range of features that customers use to find and analyze all kinds of logs."
"It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query on Splunk. The resolution time is about the same, but it took longer to discover the issue with ArcSight. Our previous solution took about an hour or more, but Splunk can do it within a few minutes or an hour at most."
"It's the completeness of the solution that we like the most."
"The graph visualization is the most valuable feature."
"We solve issues that we previously could not since we now have the data."
"The most valuable features of the solution are it is straightforward to use and the documentation is good for finding out how to get the data you are looking for."
"Splunk's visualizations make it easy for users to understand the data."
"Issues with generating reports; consistency is not there."
"I would love to be able to tell what ISP the user is coming from."
"The Web Application Firewall will send you too much information because it's more dedicated to security than a normal firewall."
"It needs to improve the way to install third-party apps and enable installation without logging into splunk.com."
"Integrating tools and creating use cases could be easier. It's hard for a junior security engineer with only a couple of years of experience to write use cases. They can do it, but it's much easier in a solution like IBM QRadar. Setting conditions is like a multiple-choice type of thing. It's a more user-friendly process."
"Splunk needs local technical support."
"More training on PetaData using artificial intelligence techniques to identify the events which are not normal and exceptions that would help the organization identify threats and malware on the go with results."
"DMC should be a little more intuitive with better dashboarding. Seeing the cause of data flow can be tough to track down."
"The product was difficult to back up the first time."
"Technical support needs to be more responsive."
Earn 20 points
Goliath Performance Monitor is ranked 61st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while Splunk Enterprise Security is ranked 1st in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) with 240 reviews. Goliath Performance Monitor is rated 7.6, while Splunk Enterprise Security is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Goliath Performance Monitor writes "Monitors well with Citrix, stable, and the support is very responsive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Enterprise Security writes "It has a drag-and-drop interface, so you don't need to know SQL or Java to construct a query ". Goliath Performance Monitor is most compared with ControlUp and Zabbix, whereas Splunk Enterprise Security is most compared with Wazuh, Dynatrace, IBM Security QRadar, Elastic Security and Microsoft Sentinel.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
