We performed a comparison between Group-IB Threat Intelligence and Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool's most valuable feature is the sandbox."
"Threat Intelligence's best feature is threat activation."
"We have found the site intelligence features to be the most valuable."
"The most valuable Group-IB Threat Intelligence features are their detections, especially in terms of account and card information leakage. This data sets Group-IB apart from some of the competition."
"The totality of the recordings is quite important. The networks, the new threat actors, the new methods, tactics, techniques, and procedures."
"The real-time threat intelligence features are useful."
"The solution improved our overall security posture."
"As the landscape evolves, they could provide a little more detail or specificity to map it to the MITRE ATT&CK framework."
"The lack of appliance-based or on-premise options for this solution is its biggest downfall. Clients request them often."
"Group-IB Threat Intelligence should improve integration for SIEM and SOAR solutions."
"Threat Intelligence's OT security could be improved."
"The web intelligence could be improved. It is not as good as the intelligence from other solutions."
"The solution is limited."
"More insights would be helpful. We have multiple solutions for threat intelligence. If someone has a bigger view or full eye on all the incidents, it will be beneficial."
Group-IB Threat Intelligence is ranked 9th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 5 reviews while Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services is ranked 26th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews. Group-IB Threat Intelligence is rated 8.8, while Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Group-IB Threat Intelligence writes "Easy to setup, highly stable and scalable and efficiently tracks threat actors and analyze their tactics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services writes "Provides useful real-time threat intelligence features but has limited capabilities". Group-IB Threat Intelligence is most compared with Recorded Future, CrowdStrike Falcon, Mandiant Advantage, Anomali ThreatStream and LogRhythm SIEM, whereas Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon. See our Group-IB Threat Intelligence vs. Kaspersky Threat Intelligence Services report.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.