HCL Domino vs Zimbra Collaboration comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HCLTech Logo
1,325 views|660 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
Zimbra Logo
5,336 views|4,088 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HCL Domino and Zimbra Collaboration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Rapid Application Development Software Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,127 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"HCL Domino is the best product from a security point of view.""It is an excellent solution.""The DAOS feature is the most valuable. It helps to save some of my storage.""The full-text searching capabilities are great.""HCL Domino is an application development and collaboration platform with strong stability and security. Deployment of this platform is easy and takes only 10 minutes.""Domino's dual functionality as both a messaging and application solution is a standout feature compared to Exchange, which solely focuses on messaging.""This solution can be used for workflow application so that applications can be easily developed.""It serves as a centralized solution that fulfills all my requirements from operating my email server to managing various aspects of my operations."

More HCL Domino Pros →

"The configuration is simple.""The backup and storage management features of Zimbra Collaboration are valuable.""Zimbra Collaboration has integrated a lot of their party tools and they have good documentation available.""The solution is easy to implement.""Zimbra Collaboration is light to manage. It works on the Linux operating system, which is far better to manage than Microsoft Windows. Microsoft Exchange works only on the Windows server. We prefer working on the Linux server for security reasons and ease of management. Zimbra Collaboration also has some integrated tools for security. It some modules to fight malware. These modules are not very powerful but are still doing a great job. Microsoft Exchange doesn't have a basic module. You have to purchase a security solution and add it to the solution. The cost of Zimbra Collaboration is one more reason for liking it. It is also very simple to migrate from Zimbra Collaboration to another email solution.""Zimbra Collaboration is a good tool for video calls...Zimbra Collaboration's initial setup phase was easy.""Zimbra Collaboration's best feature is its compatibility with Microsoft's ActiveSync protocol, which allows users to use Outlook on Windows or MacOS.""A lot of other products like Microsoft Exchange offer email or collaboration features, but they are not as fast as Zimbra."

More Zimbra Collaboration Pros →

Cons
"From the Domino side, it should support DKIM and DMARC.""They should provide its integration with other AI applications.""Designing a new template could provide a refreshed visual experience for users without significant changes to the underlying functionality.""Its performance and integration could be better. It has capabilities for large deployment with several servers, but in the latest interface, running with different servers isn't supported.""HCL Domino could have a better interface.""The solution could improve Kubernetes or Dockers migration to new environments in the cloud.""The client version of this solution could be faster and be made simpler for non-IT users. You will need to have some knowledge of Notes to correctly install this solution.""HCL Domino could improve by having integration with other solutions, such as Microsoft 365."

More HCL Domino Cons →

"We have had an issue with security.""Zimbra Collaboration's video conferencing could be improved.""It does have a few bugs.""There are some security issues.""The antispam and antivirus features are hard to understand on mobile devices.""The support was lacking in my experience. However, recently the support I received was good. Perhaps they have improved.""I can confidently say that Zimbra is good enough for 2,000 client users. But, at the same time, if my client needs more than that and we have two options—Zimbra or Microsoft—I'm going with Microsoft because many admins will speak to Microsoft's ability to handle that many.""The tool should improve its multi-cloud feature."

More Zimbra Collaboration Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Price is reasonable compared to the other solutions."
  • "We're happy with the price of our license — it's pretty standard."
  • "We pay annually for the use of this solution and it is only a standard fee."
  • "We chose to pay for our licensing fees annually."
  • "Customers have to pay for a license for the Notes Client, not for the Domino database. There is a quarter license that we use."
  • "HCL Domino has reasonable pricing. It's not expensive."
  • "For 30 licenses, we pay $1,500 every year. It is not an expensive product."
  • "HCL Domino is costly, but it still depends on how your organization views it price-wise."
  • More HCL Domino Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Zimbra Collaboration is less expensive than Microsoft Exchange. Zimbra works for small companies because it is not expensive. Zimbra Collaboration has more security tools than Microsoft Exchange. If you are choosing between Zimbra Collaboration and Microsoft Exchange, you have to take into account the cost of security tools with Microsoft Exchange. When you purchase Microsoft Exchange, you will also have to purchase tools for security, which adds to the cost. The migration from Zimbra Collaboration to another email solution is very simple and easy. Migration from Microsoft Exchange to another email solution is very difficult. Microsoft doesn't allow migration that easily. In fact, you have to pay for tools to do that. You have to buy some expensive tools to migrate."
  • "If you choose the network edition, it is a little pricier. They have the open-source edition too which is only community supported."
  • "We are using perpetual licenses. We have deployed it in our local data center, and we buy perpetual licenses on a per-user basis."
  • "When it comes to the licensing of Zimbra Collaboration, my license covers the servers and I find its terms to be much simpler than those of Microsoft Exchange."
  • "We do not pay for licenses to use this solution."
  • "The price of the solution is low."
  • "It's very expensive. When we compare the cost with Google Workspace, it's so expensive."
  • "There is an annual standard licensing fee to use Zimbra Collaboration and there is no other cost."
  • More Zimbra Collaboration Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
    772,127 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of the solution are security and integration.
    Top Answer:My company's customers need to make monthly or yearly payments towards the license charges of the product.
    Top Answer:I expect more integration capabilities from the platform in the future. HCL Domino has made a lot of changes in its pricing and market models. The product's user interface is one of its shortcomings… more »
    Top Answer:Zimbra is a free, open source collaborative software suite. The features I like best are the ease of integration and the email, calendar, and collaboration server with web interface. In addition, I… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Zimbra for our team's productivity is its efficiency in handling email communication.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,325
    Comparisons
    660
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    441
    Rating
    8.1
    4th
    out of 24 in Email Applications
    Views
    5,336
    Comparisons
    4,088
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    275
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM Lotus Domino, Lotus Domino
    Learn More
    Overview

    HCL Domino (formerly IBM Domino) is a secure, enterprise-grade, application development platform. From IT to business, HCL Domino is the only low to pro-code application development platform that allows your business to build robust applications to solve workflow and process challenges fast. HCL Domino powers businesses around the world with 15,000 customers and 10 million apps built on our platform. HCL Domino has always been a secure, rock-solid, and proven solution.

    • Low cost of ownership - minimizing administration needs through automated installations, policies and monitoring helps staff focus on higher value tasks.
    • Minimized infrastructure - reducing costs by using less power, memory, data storage, network bandwidth and servers.
    • Rich application environment - supporting workflow-driven and people-oriented applications that help a wide variety of business operations deliver enhanced results.
    • Security-rich - helping protect your critical business assets. You can control information access, protect information and guarantee document authenticity.
    • High availability - featuring advanced clustering, replication, server fault recovery and automated diagnostic tools.
    Zimbra Collaboration provides administrators and their end users innovative features that solve the challenges faced by organizations using today's legacy communications infrastructure.
    Sample Customers
    A1 Telekom, Acubiz, Afrisam, E. A. Juffali & Brothers, Fiducia & GAD, and Pakistan State Oil
    NEC Biglobe, City of Ventura, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Hola Publishing, BIG, Sleepwell, LaFayette College, Xmission, DNA, Ring Line, Future Group, TIGC
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Transportation Company9%
    Insurance Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Media Company20%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Energy/Utilities Company20%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Government11%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business76%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise59%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business68%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise21%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise48%
    Buyer's Guide
    Rapid Application Development Software
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software. Updated: May 2024.
    772,127 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HCL Domino is ranked 17th in Rapid Application Development Software with 18 reviews while Zimbra Collaboration is ranked 4th in Email Applications with 28 reviews. HCL Domino is rated 8.0, while Zimbra Collaboration is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HCL Domino writes "A stable and versatile enterprise solution consolidating various functions like email, collaboration, and application development in a user-friendly manner". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zimbra Collaboration writes "Provides good email capability; lacking in security and performance". HCL Domino is most compared with Microsoft Exchange, HCL Notes, Microsoft Power Apps, Microsoft Exchange Online and HCL Verse, whereas Zimbra Collaboration is most compared with Microsoft Exchange, Open-Xchange, IceWarp, Google Workspace and Microsoft Exchange Online.

    We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.