We performed a comparison between Helix ALM and Polarion Requirements based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Requirements Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Helix ALM enables users to build, make efficient and effective decisions, and use least-cost methods for maximum benefit, as fast as possible. They allow you to see and visualize your configuration."
"The tool offers high stability."
"The most valuable features of Helix ALM are traceability and flexibility."
"I like the way this solution is structured."
"We worked with the web interface."
"In my opinion, Polarion Requirements' most beneficial feature is the ability to manage specifications within a work-like document that functions as a work item. Its collaboration features have worked very well and have been very useful. We can easily exchange information with the testing team, the business, and with DevOps."
"I would say there is value in how powerful, configurable, and user-friendly it is."
"A valuable feature from my side would be the comparison corporization."
"Polarion Requirements' most valuable features are link tracing, book entry, and sequence training features."
"It is easier to produce documents using the platform."
"Its flexibility and APIs are the most valuable."
"The accountability and the equivalent to using, acting, editing, working with Word, and also importing and exporting from Word needs improvement."
"It would be great to see Perforce's strategy is for implementing intelligence into the process via AI or ML. It's not clearly defined, at least not to my knowledge."
"Helix ALM should be able to integrate with other systems better. Helix ALM should also have an easier user interface, and the solution needs to have drag-and-drop tools included in it."
"Its user interface could be more user friendly. In addition, a lot of features are missing for test management. It should have the test case ordering feature."
"The usability of the solution should also be improved."
"It is not a stable solution, as we had issues with shared licenses."
"It is stable enough but if you would like to work with more requirement objects, then you will get timeouts."
"If we have more than one thousand work items in one live-book then it becomes almost unusable."
"One thing to consider is increased flexibility in terms of workflow configuration."
"Polarion Requirement needs to have a feature where we can track changes and compare documents. Currently, we do it manually."
"Integration can be a little tricky if you're not aware of basic computer science or programming language."
Helix ALM is ranked 7th in Application Requirements Management with 7 reviews while Polarion Requirements is ranked 3rd in Application Requirements Management with 13 reviews. Helix ALM is rated 6.4, while Polarion Requirements is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Helix ALM writes "Helix ALM is insanely configurable, with great traceability, and flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polarion Requirements writes "Defines, builds, tests and manages complex software systems". Helix ALM is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, Jira, IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation, Tricentis qTest and Jama Connect, whereas Polarion Requirements is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, Jama Connect, Jira and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation. See our Helix ALM vs. Polarion Requirements report.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.