We performed a comparison between Hillstone T-Series and Juniper SRX Series Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewalls solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The response is very quick and they can visually resolve our problems in a short period."
"The most valuable feature is the bundled subscription, which is IPS, TV and web filtering."
"It's very easy to configure."
"The notable features that I have found most valuable are that it includes the antivirus, and also IPS, and even SD-WAN."
"The pipe filter application is an outstanding feature."
"LinkGreat firewall capabilities"
"The SD-WAN feature is the most valuable. This feature evolved from link load balancing. It has helped us in terms of our uptime and privatizing applications whenever we experience an outage. The SD-WAN feature has been a plus for us. Two-factor authentication has allowed us to add more users in terms of remote working. We have two-factor authentication for remote workers to authenticate them before they get on the network."
"The security features are about the best that I've seen anywhere."
"We installed Hillstone T-Series after a ransomware attack. The dashboard and user interface are very good."
"It has been stable so far."
"The only firewall able to monitor traffic from a CCTV network. Can detect unauthorized devices plugged into the network, which standard firewalls can't do."
"The virtualization feature is the most valuable feature. Sometimes customers are requesting a private connection using mobile data when they are connecting to remote sites."
"It uses many applications, like antivirus blocking and web filtering."
"The technical support is quite good."
"Juniper supports their products very well."
"I have used technical support quite a bit, and they are really good."
"Juniper SRX Series Firewall is a stable solution."
"It helps us perform our daily jobs."
"It helped us with its routing capabilities which eased the cost, because otherwise I would have had to take a router and firewall, and then integrate it. With this, however, it was an integration of firewall and routing services all together in a single product. That was one thing that I loved about it."
"We would like to see a better training platform implemented."
"The support costs and licensing are sometimes so expensive."
"Its reporting and pricing need improvement."
"The ease of use could be improved."
"Pricing for it is a bit high. It could be cheaper."
"Bandwidth usage in reporting could be improved for Fortinet FortiGate."
"It is quite new for us, and we need to go more in-depth into the monitoring tools. It provides different features that we need to do what we want. So far, it is okay for us. In terms of improvement, in the future, they can provide a faster implementation of features. Some of the features are first available in other solutions. Fortinet sometimes takes a little bit longer than other solutions, such as Check Point, to implement new features."
"The support team for Fortinet FortiGate needs to be more customer friendly."
"They have a very good technical support team, but I think there are some communication issues due to language differences."
"Licensing is not cheap."
"Another loophole with Hillstone T-Series is that when we connect through WiFi and turn our hot spot on, all who connect through the hotspot get all the functions, and the security does not work."
"The Juniper SRX product needs to improve in terms of innovation."
"The solution's configurations and syntax are specific and more complicated than other platforms."
"It could have features that other products support like blade options and stand-alone endpoint security."
"I would like them to add a dashboard because it's difficult to operate."
"To compare with Fortinet, Juniper needs to improve their security features."
"The CLI is verbose. You have to say a lot to do a little. I don't like that part of it. Cisco's command syntax seems to be a good bit more concise. When you're trying to get something done, you don't want to have to type a bunch."
"The interface could be more user-friendly."
"Juniper needs to focus more on their perimeter firewalls."
Hillstone T-Series is ranked 36th in Firewalls with 3 reviews while Juniper SRX Series Firewall is ranked 16th in Firewalls with 87 reviews. Hillstone T-Series is rated 7.4, while Juniper SRX Series Firewall is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Hillstone T-Series writes "Is stable and has a user-friendly dashboard and a good interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper SRX Series Firewall writes "Highly scalable, user-friendly UI, and easy to maintain". Hillstone T-Series is most compared with Sangfor NGAF and WatchGuard Firebox, whereas Juniper SRX Series Firewall is most compared with Cisco Secure Firewall, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Netgate pfSense, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls and Check Point NGFW. See our Hillstone T-Series vs. Juniper SRX Series Firewall report.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors and best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.