We performed a comparison between HPE Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of this solution are it supports the newest virus technology, which helps with bandwidth, and is very stable."
"The tool is easy to manage."
"The reliability is good."
"It is a good and stable solution."
"The most important is that the solution is stable."
"The WiFi and high scalability are the most valuable features."
"The support has been responsive and helpful."
"The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability."
"In general, the setup process is straightforward."
"It functions properly and includes centralized management for access points and switches."
"The most valuable aspect of Ubiquiti is the ease of setup. It's easy to set up, secure, and use. It works on an adoption basis. I can pull the system up, design a network, and pull 20 different Ubiquiti units into it."
"The main strength of Ubiquiti Wireless is the ease of use it provides to users."
"The ease of the setup is one of its most valuable aspects."
"The setup is easy and user friendly."
"Having dual-band is important. Having compatibility with very old equipment on certain frequencies, for example on 2.4 and 5.8."
"One of the nice features is the backup version control."
"The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the prices to be lowered further."
"The HPE Wireless dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"Technical support could be improved. They could respond a bit faster."
"HPE Wireless WAN could provide better access points and better pricing."
"The tool must warn the management about unwanted traffic."
"HPE should improve performance and stability."
"The scalability is good, but it could improve."
"The sales sync should connect with and sync up with the customers."
"Ubiquiti could develop a more elaborate firewall solution. Their firewall solutions at the moment are entry-level. Maybe they don't want to bring those products in because many people prefer putting a third-party firewall into a solution like that. We usually do."
"They have access points that are in the firewalls, and I believe the firewalls could be significantly better. They use the USG firewall, which I believe is a poor device. VPNs for example, it is really bad, it is difficult to configure, and I don't like them at all."
"We have an issue with Ubiquiti Wireless every three to five months for one of the access points."
"They should have more VLAN features and a designing tool like a link planer."
"The technical support is less than stellar."
"Some of our customers have reported problems with their outdoor WiFi connections."
"The mesh configuration and WiFi 6 coverage should be improved."
"The product lacks to offer reliability to users."
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 7th in Wireless WAN with 18 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with , whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Aruba Wireless and ExtremeCloud IQ. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.