We performed a comparison between IBM Maximo and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Asset Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met."
"The most valuable features of IBM Maximo are the overall power and interface, and there are a lot of different modules that we use that are helpful. Additionally, it's an integrated solution and it has a lot of capabilities."
"The most valuable feature is asset management maintenance as well as asset management overall."
"The most valuable features are the ability to create work orders and preventative maintenance."
"I have found Work Order management the most valuable feature. Additionally, it is a very robust and powerful solution."
"There are not many enterprise asset management systems on the market and not many that have the categories that IBM Maximo has."
"Reliable, very configurable, and it's all integrated in the same database."
"We were doing all kinds of paperwork for every type of order and to maintain our assets but with the use of the IBM Maximo application, we can automate a lot of the processes."
"The product enables us to track our assets."
"The most demonstrable feature is the asset creation form, which is quite informative."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Pros →
"The solution is not stable. We can have one day when it is stable and another day it is not. Sometimes it crashes or becomes very slow, and there are times we are not even able to download all the databases. Without the database, we cannot work on that application. These are the small glitches, and stability issues we are facing."
"Maximo is a big system, so the initial setup is complex."
"Revision management of file attachments."
"Areas for improvement would be the user interface and support for Arabic. They could also be more customer-oriented."
"The interface is not very easy or user-friendly and is in need of improvement."
"It's quite reliable, but new versions often are not too stable. They bring in enhancements but they break other stuff."
"Initial setup is a longer process because Maximo is bigger and has more processes."
"The mobile solution has a lot of room for improvement, especially in geopositioning capabilities, tracking capabilities, and configuration capabilities, in order to let the tech operate online and offline."
"The UI and UX need severe improvements."
"The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
"The solution’s depreciation calculation setup needs to be improved because it is slightly disintegrated."
More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Cons →
More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Maximo is ranked 1st in Enterprise Asset Management with 23 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is ranked 5th in Enterprise Asset Management with 4 reviews. IBM Maximo is rated 8.0, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Maximo writes "Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management writes "The product is reasonably priced and easy to set up, but the UI and UX need severe improvements". IBM Maximo is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM, NetSuite ERP and BMC Helix ITSM, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is most compared with . See our IBM Maximo vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management report.
See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.