We performed a comparison between IBM Maximo and Oracle Enterprise Asset Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Oracle and others in Enterprise Asset Management."The large range of configurability of the product is great, since everyone has a different way of doing things."
"The most valuable features are the ability to create work orders and preventative maintenance."
"Its capabilities let us organize our work."
"There are not many enterprise asset management systems on the market and not many that have the categories that IBM Maximo has."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to correct maintenance."
"They have a real strength of tracking the asset itself along with the condition of the asset, the maintenance of the asset and who has access to the asset, etc."
"The most powerful features are the database and integration with CMDB."
"The Preventive Maintenance feature, especially in its inspection routines and KPI abilities, is valuable."
"The whole product is important and valuable to us."
"The interface is not very easy or user-friendly and is in need of improvement."
"The initial setup was complex, because it is a complex product."
"There are always ways to improve and make things better."
"Coding can be complex when customization is required."
"This solution could improve by integrating or embedding finances, charts of accounts, and invoicing."
"It was very slow due to the lagging issues. So that was kind of frustrating, considering how slow it was while functioning."
"The solution is not stable. We can have one day when it is stable and another day it is not. Sometimes it crashes or becomes very slow, and there are times we are not even able to download all the databases. Without the database, we cannot work on that application. These are the small glitches, and stability issues we are facing."
"It's not user-friendly. It could use shortcuts for frequently requested services."
"The product is not user-friendly."
More Oracle Enterprise Asset Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Maximo is ranked 1st in Enterprise Asset Management with 23 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Asset Management with 1 review. IBM Maximo is rated 8.0, while Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of IBM Maximo writes "Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Asset Management writes "The product is not user-friendly, and it is very expensive, though it is highly stable". IBM Maximo is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM, NetSuite ERP and Coupa Invoice, whereas Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is most compared with ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM.
See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.