We performed a comparison between IBM Security Guardium Data Protection and Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Imperva, Oracle and others in Database Security."The most valuable feature I have found is the performance of client monitoring. The other competitors are unable to do this."
"We now have the ability to begin to understand how people, applications, and service accounts are interacting with data to better protect it."
"Our internal audit is keeping an eye out, and making sure that we're in compliance. Having the Guardium solution and its reporting helps us get through that process a lot more quickly and efficiently."
"The most valuable features are the reporting and data-level access control."
"The most valuable features of this product are activity monitoring on the database servers, discovery capabilities, and vulnerability scanning."
"Its ability to find data."
"The vulnerability assessment is a valuable feature."
"Supports security initiatives and ensures compliance policies."
"This solution delivers the value that it is supposed to deliver."
"Right now we're having some issues where it's using a high CPU, we don't know why. So, better testing before the product is ready would help."
"I'd like to them make sure that the data sources can be more easily managed, because some of them are tied to multiple things. You try to remove one and you have to go to all the different spots to remove the associations before you can get rid of it."
"The integration part of the present solution is very complex and tedious. Plus it gives a lot of false positives which need to be eradicated over time."
"There are features like end-to-end and S-TAP mapping, and the ability to install policies for your configuration builder. They're not there, but we'd like to see them in the next version."
"Guardium's storage capabilities could use some improvement. I'd also like to have some better integration using digital technology or a connector."
"The solution could be improved for NoSQL databases."
"It was difficult implementing it, configuring it, getting it up and running and in production. However, since then, I believe it has stabilized."
"The technical support is very poor."
"There are not a lot of templates available to use, so we had to start many things from scratch."
More IBM Security Guardium Data Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is ranked 1st in Database Security with 71 reviews while Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting is ranked 14th in Data Masking. IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is rated 8.2, while Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Security Guardium Data Protection writes "Provides visibility, has a single console that shows all information, and collector-aggregator capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting writes "Stable with good support but the single-sign on could be improved". IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is most compared with Imperva SecureSphere Database Security, Oracle Audit Vault, Oracle Advanced Security, DataSunrise Database Security and IBM InfoSphere Optim Data Privacy, whereas Oracle Data Masking and Subsetting is most compared with Oracle Advanced Security.
We monitor all Database Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
