We performed a comparison between IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT and Microsoft Configuration Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about ServiceNow, BMC, Freshworks and others in IT Asset Management."IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is a user-friendly solution that has a good user interface."
"Patching is very effective and reporting is very good."
"Automation of operating system, application, and update deployments massively reduces IT operations effort."
"It's helped us solve problems surrounding patching, installing, and reporting different patches, etc., on the virtual machines."
"This solution helps us by automating the patching of our system."
"The cloud account management is a valuable feature."
"It is a good choice for deployment that performs very well."
"With the right administrator, application deployment can do wonders."
"The solution is user-friendly and easy to learn."
"The solution’s initial setup is complex and technical support is not good enough."
"In terms of scalability, I believe there's room for improvement. While SCCM is capable of handling our current needs effectively, scalability could be enhanced to accommodate future growth and larger deployments."
"The solution is on-premises. The cloud version of the product, if a person needs to be on the cloud, would be InTune, which already exists as an option. SCCM doesn't need to offer cloud features for this reason."
"Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager can improve by allowing us to schedule the scripts, we don't have a script scheduling option and have to do it manually."
"I would like to see some improvements in WSUS and control of other, non-Microsoft, product updates."
"On some hardware, we'd like an easier way to get peripherals attached."
"It would be better if reporting were more user-friendly. I would like to see an upgrade in the reporting structure in the next release. At the moment, you have to use an SQL query or configure it to pull reports through the graphical user interface. Their updates could be more regular. I think Mircosoft updates it every six months. They are also moving many things to Intune, and Microsoft decided to move the deployment solution there. I think SCCM is getting old, and Intune is new."
"Cloud-based improvements need to be better managed."
"In terms of the monitoring, the timeframe it takes to actually report back on the compliance of a device after it has been patched is a bit too long."
More IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Microsoft Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is ranked 17th in IT Asset Management with 1 review while Microsoft Configuration Manager is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 78 reviews. IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is rated 7.0, while Microsoft Configuration Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT writes "A user-friendly solution that has a good user interface, but its technical support is not good enough". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Configuration Manager writes "Seamless system updates, useful integration, and reliable". IBM Tivoli Asset Management for IT is most compared with ServiceNow and BigFix, whereas Microsoft Configuration Manager is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, BigFix, Microsoft Intune and Tanium.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
