Icinga vs Spiceworks comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Icinga Logo
3,564 views|3,156 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
Spiceworks Logo
1,317 views|684 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Icinga and Spiceworks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Icinga vs. Spiceworks Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We have found the solution to be stable.""Macros and the ability to connect it to Google Maps are valuable features.""Icinga does the job and is fairly stable.""An affordable solution for small organizations to do basic network monitoring.""This solution has a self-healing handler where if the service is down, it is automatically restarted.""The value of Icinga is that it has hundreds of plugins, so it's really easy to monitor pretty much anything.""The apply rules feature saves a lot of time.""The drafts are easy but what I like about Icinga is that there are many add-ons that you can download."

More Icinga Pros →

"Tickets by e-mail, with actions by hastag.""Spiceworks' dashboard allows you to drill down to the notes, where I can take an inventory of the network and see the devices I need to monitor.""It lets us know whether devices are getting out of date and tracked warranties. Spiceworks also gave me visibility in terms of what software was installed on each device and its status.""The nice thing about Spiceworks is always it's free. Monitoring of printers for low toner. Finding machines that have low memory or low hard disk space.""Helpdesk and inventory are both equally valuable, and they form the true core of the product.""The most valuable features are the inventory and personalization.""It was easy to integrate Spiceworks with our existing setup.""It's easy to understand."

More Spiceworks Pros →

Cons
"One of the areas that are frustrating is remote monitoring for more than one machine.""The solution lacks many features important to higher-level IT management and network support.""The user interface should be improved.""The installation and configuration are very complex.""In general, the product does not look good. However, it does what it is supposed to do. So, the improvements should focus on usability and UI.""We have found some problems with Nagios, and support isn't very responsive.""It needs Trap SNMP. I saw the documentation for Zabbix, that it has its own built-in product which handles SNMP traps, and there's nothing similar in Icinga or Nagios. I think this feature is most important for me.""The tool currently fails to provide notifications to users."

More Icinga Cons →

"I would like to see more information when drilling down into access permissions, assignments management, or tagging. When I click a note or a device, I should be able to see more details about the router and modem. For example, I want to see the version, downtime, availability, latency, etc. I should have easy access to everything about our assets at a glance.""The GUI must be improved.""There are a lot of disadvantages to Spiceworks because it's not an agent-based solution.""The SNMP sniffer requires a lot of work to get right.""With Spiceworks, like, when I open the websites, I have to Zoom in. I need to zoom in on those websites sometimes because it makes it horrible to use.""I would like the solution to allow for more direct interaction with computers. I can open tickets and I can see their status, but I can't interact directly with the computers themselves.""Sometimes, it can be difficult to integrate what you need.""Having an integrated asset management tool, where I can plug in things that are offline, would be good."

More Spiceworks Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."
  • "This is an open-source solution with paid support."
  • "It's an open-source solution."
  • "We're using the free version of Icinga."
  • "Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."
  • "The solution is free to use."
  • "The solution is cheap."
  • More Icinga Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The product is free! Get it now."
  • "It's free."
  • "It might be about $300 annually for a bigger company. If you pay annually, it's better and cheaper."
  • "Seeing that it is a low-cost solution, I would advise you to go ahead with Spiceworks and experiment with it to see if you can get things working properly, especially if you currently don't have any existing service desk software in place."
  • "The tool is cheap."
  • More Spiceworks Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want using these, but they require quite some expertise before you can use them. Then there are the ones that are not open source, the enterprise softwares and cost you some money, but on the other hand, they are extremely easy to set-up and learn. You can have them up and running in a matter of minutes. And then there are those which are completely cloud based. They can be free of cost or charge some money depending on the software. The good thing about these is that you don’t have to install any extra software, and it can be managed completely online but then again these have limited features and you cannot exploit them to the full extent as you can do with the open-source and to some extent the enterprise software, so I won’t suggest you to use these, because these are generally not the complete solutions and require other support software to achieve the same. Below I have listed the outstanding pros and cons of the various Network analyzers that you can look into Nagios Pros: Nagios offers an extensive set of collector plug-ins that allows users to gather performance and availability data from a broad range of operating systems, including  Windows and Netware Nagios… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first.
    Top Answer:I wasn't involved with the finance side of the product. I just tested the product and gave feedback to the IT team in our company.
    Top Answer:I didn't have a problem with Icinga since I just use it for monitoring purposes. I haven't faced any issues with Icinga to date, and I think that it is a good solution. Right now, in my company… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is easy to use and easy to manage.
    Top Answer:The GUI must be improved. The GUI looks old-fashioned. The vendor must do some web development for it.
    Ranking
    Views
    3,564
    Comparisons
    3,156
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    596
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    1,317
    Comparisons
    684
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    666
    Rating
    7.2
    Comparisons
    Zabbix logo
    Compared 27% of the time.
    Checkmk logo
    Compared 20% of the time.
    Nagios Core logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Nagios XI logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Centreon logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Zabbix logo
    Compared 24% of the time.
    Lansweeper logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    ServiceNow logo
    Compared 19% of the time.
    Freshdesk logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Icinga Cloud Monitoring
    Learn More
    Overview
    Icinga monitors infrastructures of all sizes with the integrated cluster system secured by SSL, Integrates with DevOps tools and uses an object based configuration or provision on users' monitoring code through the REST API. Icinga has a lightweight and extensible web interface to keep an eye on your environment and provides modules that extend the functionality of Icinga Web 2. Additionally, it offers a fully preconfigured monitoring stack or just add an external perspective.
    From network inventory and network monitoring to help desk software, and mobile device management (MDM) to cloud services detection, Spiceworks helps you manage everything about your IT workday from one easy place.
    Sample Customers
    Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre
    Broward Center for the Performing Arts, Symantec, Webroot, EMC, Pertino
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Educational Organization14%
    University14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Construction Company10%
    Educational Organization6%
    Transportation Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Government7%
    University7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business47%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise21%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise49%
    Buyer's Guide
    Icinga vs. Spiceworks
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Icinga vs. Spiceworks and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Icinga is ranked 23rd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 16 reviews while Spiceworks is ranked 33rd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 47 reviews. Icinga is rated 7.6, while Spiceworks is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Icinga writes "A stable, scalable and cost-effective solution that helps with inbuilt scripts for easy modification". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spiceworks writes "Good low-cost service desk system, but lacks in automation workflows and categorization ". Icinga is most compared with Zabbix, Checkmk, Nagios Core, Nagios XI and Centreon, whereas Spiceworks is most compared with Zabbix, Lansweeper, ServiceNow, Freshdesk and ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus. See our Icinga vs. Spiceworks report.

    See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

    We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.