We performed a comparison between IIS and Oracle WebLogic Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Server solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is easy to use and connects with Microsoft."
"It's good and offers good usability."
"The solution has been reliable."
"The solution is easy to use."
"This is definitely a stable solution."
"The solution integrates well with most Microsoft products."
"IIS's most valuable feature is user-friendliness."
"The tool shows us the operating systems where our servers and applications are running."
"It has helped us to have different clusters within different servers, which allows us to identify hacker attacks."
"One of the good features of Oracle WebLogic Server was the ability to add some custom parameters to its deployment and performance."
"We have some hosted servers as well as some of our own. It performs well."
"WebLogic is reliable, and it's easy to use for development."
"It is good because it's easy to use. It doesn't crash frequently like other servers."
"It is quite robust in comparison to other application servers."
"The tool's technical support is very good."
"It's a very stable solution."
"The solution's stability needs improvement."
"The solution must improve the integration between its databases."
"In the next release, I would like to see better integration between the cloud environment and the on-premises environment."
"The areas of this solution that need improvement are monitoring, debugging, and troubleshooting."
"There is an issue with the network. The tool's price is also high."
"This solution needs to be easier for cases where you want to have an IIS cluster."
"The solution is slow and could have better performance."
"The documentation of IIS could be better. They are not easily accessible. I had to use YouTube and other online resources to learn how to use the solution properly."
"Managing and monitoring the WebLogic server environment has been challenging because most monitoring tools don't support it."
"The logs consultant, since it tends to be more in the server, we do need complete consult logs for a lot of different files."
"I can't point to anything missing."
"The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved."
"The cost could always be lower."
"Oracle WebLogic Server's configuration could be improved because we need to do multiple configurations when setting up anything."
"In terms of what could be improved, maybe something related to the processes automation or starting and stopping the processes, because often WebLogic comes with something called Node Manager. Node Manager needs to be configured and administrated manually."
"Licensing fees need improvement."
IIS is ranked 4th in Application Server with 53 reviews while Oracle WebLogic Server is ranked 1st in Application Server with 32 reviews. IIS is rated 8.0, while Oracle WebLogic Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IIS writes " A simple and easy-to-use solution but not recommended for public apps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebLogic Server writes " The installation phase is very easy". IIS is most compared with NGINX Plus, Apache Web Server, Tomcat, JBoss and Microsoft .NET Framework, whereas Oracle WebLogic Server is most compared with Tomcat, JBoss, Oracle Application Server, Oracle Fusion Middleware and Oracle GlassFish. See our IIS vs. Oracle WebLogic Server report.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
