We performed a comparison between Infobright DB and MySQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has very amazing smart grid query feature for very fast aggregate queries across millions of rows"
"It's a good tool, a good database platform."
"MySQL is a light database. It's not very complex. It's easy to develop, easy to maintain, and easy to back up and restore."
"I like MySQL because of its community."
"The solution helps us perform with our databases and extract data."
"I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten since it has been running flawlessly."
"MySQL is easy and convenient for me. I don't need to rely on anyone. I can write the code and extract the information. It is fast if you know how to use it. The solution is not expensive, and most of the developers know how to use it. It is easy to create tables. The solution is stable and has good performance. The connection with AWS gives regular updates, which is manual otherwise and a nightmare."
"My main reason for using MySQL for this small customer database company and for some kinds of scientific projects was that I had to do the installation myself. I didn't have a database administration team behind me. Therefore, I was looking for something very easy to handle. MySQL is easy to install, connect, and do all such things."
"Support for enterprise-grade features like clustering, master-slave replication, even Sharding (to some extent) which is an advanced feature."
"Only the data from the columns that reached 2GB will actually decrease. Other columns below 2GB in size do not leave the disk."
"The workbench could be improved. In particular, error messages can be improved, which are horrific and completely unhelpful. I'd like to see improved parsing of errors. When you write SQL and it crashes, it usually is something completely irrelevant and not helpful. I've started to use GPT 3.5 for finding out how to do things. I got to do something a bit different, and that I found to be very useful. If there was some way to tie it into one of the new AI tools, that would probably be a good idea."
"I would like to improve the solution’s pricing for licenses."
"Security is a concern. MySQL could have better security features."
"I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. It does break down a little at times."
"At times, the autoscaling does not happen when there is a surge in load."
"The solution is expensive."
"It requires a training platform."
"It should have some code analytical functions. It can also have a monitoring tool."
Earn 20 points
Infobright DB is ranked 30th in Relational Databases Tools while MySQL is ranked 4th in Relational Databases Tools with 142 reviews. Infobright DB is rated 7.6, while MySQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infobright DB writes "If you need a real big data solution, look for a distributed solution that actually has a proven track record". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MySQL writes "Good beginner base but it should have better support for backups". Infobright DB is most compared with LocalDB, whereas MySQL is most compared with Firebird SQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, Teradata and SAP HANA. See our Infobright DB vs. MySQL report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.