We performed a comparison between Informatica Axon and Information Builders Data Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance."The most valuable feature of Informatica Axon is that it is flexible and user-friendly."
"Axon does one interesting thing that I don't think other tools do as well. It lets you rate data and incorporates Informatica's data quality feature into it. There are little indications and graphics that show you how good the data quality is, and you can drill into it to see where potential issues lie."
"The features that I have found most valuable are, first of all, that it comes as part of this whole bundle of Informatica tools. So if you've been implementing Informatica MDM across a business, you'd often find it comes with it. It's been thrown in as a sweetener. The adoption of it is often the challenge because as part of your MDM project, governance is seen as something beyond the MDM and is often restrictive. So this tool actually, for the first time, when you talk to data governance teams, gives a holistic view of what a data governance team can do with this tool."
"It is a very stable solution. I rate its stability a ten out of ten...It is a scalable solution...Informatica Axon's technical support is good."
"The dictionary, the search, and the ratings are without a doubt the most beneficial components of this solution."
"You can extract and transfer your data as you wish it to be consumed later."
"It is a scalable product."
"The feature of auto-onboarding of the assets, enterprise assets via EDC is good."
"It has an intuitive data quality engine that allows you to modify data, and apply rules to standardize it, and it's an excellent initial stage."
"In terms of what could be improved, they need to create a rules repository. Business rules for the attributes that you have, keeping them in that central repository, and governance of them is something which Axon is lacking a bit. The Informatica Data Quality tool actually caters to that, so that's probably why they have not built that up in the Axon, but it is definitely something that can be built in to this product, as well."
"They could improve technical support because it is not good enough at the moment."
"There are some limitations with Informatica Axon when one tries to connect or integrate it with Jira."
"Informatica Axon needs to improve its interface."
"The solution still is a bit manual in its functionality. We want t to be more automation-driven."
"I would like to have the solution in one product and technical support needs to be better."
"It would be great if the cloud version could match the full range of capabilities available on-premise."
"The solution should improve its integration."
"The on-premise features are undeniably robust, but having equally powerful capabilities in the cloud would be a significant enhancement."
Informatica Axon is ranked 3rd in Data Governance with 23 reviews while Information Builders Data Governance is ranked 27th in Data Governance with 1 review. Informatica Axon is rated 7.8, while Information Builders Data Governance is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Axon writes "It has a marketplace that allows you to showcase all the assets the data owner has". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Information Builders Data Governance writes "Balancing robust scalability with cloud features enhancements for streamlined operation". Informatica Axon is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance, Collibra Governance, Alation Data Catalog, BigID and erwin Data Intelligence by Quest, whereas Information Builders Data Governance is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.