We performed a comparison between Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager and Microsoft Windows Server Update Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Patch Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution is stable."
"The most valuable feature of Ivanti Patch for SCCM is the detection logic."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The performance has been okay."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to use."
"The platform provides good value in terms of time and effort by eliminating the need for manual patch management."
"Instead of leaving each server to download their own updates, with WSUS you have a centralized management tool for all the updates alongside a log for all the servers. By creating and deploying a WSUS server that will download the updates from the internet and dispatch them to the other servers, you can have control over the entire deployment process."
"The central points of managing product updates have been the tool's most valuable features."
"The product is quite stable."
"In future releases, I would like to see improvements with the feature upgrade for the SCCM, which Microsoft has already integrated. Currently, Ivanti does not give us information about the enablement package."
"We have some problems with patches not installing successfully."
"The solution must provide the issue description of the patches."
"The product must improve its support."
"Microsoft should improve their support for the product. A lot of guys are installing their products, especially Xero. If you have a real problem, though, it's quite difficult to find someone who you can support you."
"One area for potential improvement involves the administrative portal, where numerous options, including asset management and patch management, are integrated."
"More integration with different platforms would be an improvement."
"I would like to see support for other operating systems such as Linux."
"It would be good if it could deploy third-party patches or applications."
"Setup is complex."
More Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Microsoft Windows Server Update Services Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager is ranked 13th in Patch Management with 2 reviews while Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is ranked 3rd in Patch Management with 40 reviews. Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager writes "Provides detection logic that tells us which customer will record an update and is less expensive than other solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Windows Server Update Services writes "Lets us manage all our organization's updates from a single management console". Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager is most compared with Microsoft Configuration Manager, whereas Microsoft Windows Server Update Services is most compared with BigFix, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, Microsoft Configuration Manager, Quest KACE Systems Management and GFI LanGuard. See our Ivanti Patch for Configuration Manager vs. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services report.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.