We performed a comparison between Ivanti Secure Access and Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"The scalability of Pulse Client is good."
"It also provides an auto-connect feature. When you turn on your laptop and put it on auto-connect, it automatically connects."
"The most valuable feature of Pulse Client is integration with Google authenticator for two-factor authentication."
"The product has valuable virtual machines, viability options, and enhanced VPN services, enabling the option to use it in different zones."
"It is easy to configure."
"The point-to-site is pretty good for the B2C stuff. It's fairly straightforward to set up."
"It sends us a lot of detections when we have any anti-virus updates. It provides the extended time needed to update a set of time needs and notifications."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is its performance. It is very fast."
"The interoperability with various firewall and access gateway vendors is one of this solution's most valuable features"
"It is a stable solution in our company, and we monitor critical health and performance parameters daily and weekly."
"All of our offices are using Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway. The solution is scalable."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Ivanti Secure Access and Zscaler provide secure access to corporate networks, their methods and features may differ."
"Pulse Client could improve the system tokens for authentication."
"Pulse Client could improve the reports. The reports are not in PDF and we can't check the details in the reports of users who are using the VPNs."
"The connectivity should be faster."
"The solution must provide metrics to monitor the inbound and outbound traffic easily."
"They should release a less expensive version of the solution."
"I would like for them to improve the troubleshooting features. We have some problems with traffic and I can't identify where the problem is coming from. I have to open a ticket with support until it gets resolved. Microsoft doesn't offer enough tools to resolve the issue."
"The marketing material in the portal is not very user-friendly."
"Documentation and configuration settings can be improved."
"More configuration options could be included in Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway."
"The product must provide a single sign-on."
Ivanti Secure Access is ranked 27th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 3 reviews while Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is ranked 4th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 19 reviews. Ivanti Secure Access is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti Secure Access writes "Integrates well, highly reliable, but lacking reporting". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway writes "A scalable and reliable solution that enables users to connect to older protocols that other products do not have". Ivanti Secure Access is most compared with Ivanti Connect Secure, Tailscale, NetMotion Mobility and Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, whereas Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Fortinet FortiClient, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Ivanti Connect Secure. See our Ivanti Secure Access vs. Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.