We performed a comparison between Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)."The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is simple to deploy. The deployment took us ten minutes."
"The health probe is pretty good for your backend health. It tells you whether it's communicating and talking to the endpoint correctly. It is quite useful."
"The pricing is quite good."
"We can control what rules should be used and what should be disabled."
"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway gives us a lot of benefits, including domain mapping."
"We use the product in front-end and back-end applications to do the load balancing smartly."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is its ease of use."
"The production is a valuable feature."
"We find it valuable because it is compatible with our existing Azure solution."
"In terms of what needs improvement, the price could be lowered. We've tried to deploy more of them but our purchasing department has said that they're way too expensive and they would prefer to use something else."
"The solution has many limitations. You cannot upgrade the VPN to the application gateway. So I started with version one, which has limited capabilities, and they provided version two. And unfortunately, I cannot upgrade from v one to v two like other services. So I have to decommission the version one and create a new one with version two. Also the version one was complex with the certificates uploading the SQL certificates."
"The security of the product could be adjusted."
"The tool's pricing could be improved."
"The graphical interface needs improvement because it is not user friendly."
"Needs easier integration with the existing SIAM."
"Application Gateway’s limitation is that the private and the public endpoint cannot use the same port."
"For the first-time user, it is difficult to understand so the user-interface needs to be improved."
"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's first deployment is complex. It needs to improve its pricing."
More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is ranked 18th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is ranked 4th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 40 reviews. Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is rated 9.0, while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall writes "Good feature set and is simple to deploy ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway writes "High stability with built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure". Ivanti Virtual Web Application Firewall is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), NGINX Plus, Citrix NetScaler and Avi Networks Software Load Balancer, whereas Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most compared with AWS WAF, Citrix NetScaler, F5 Advanced WAF, Azure Front Door and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall.
See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors and best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.