We performed a comparison between Jira and Parasoft Development Testing Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."No other platform can compete on speed or search."
"The level of stability is quite good."
"One of the valuable features is traceability from requirements to test cases."
"Jira is very user friendly, easy to install, and easy to access."
"It's very flexible. I can define workflows and custom fields and dependencies between issues and projects. And every project can have a custom configuration with my fields, my names for fields, my validations, and my workflows. It's very customizable."
"Its visual display and ease of use are most valuable."
"It allows you to do a lot of stuff, and the functionality is pretty rich. It integrates well with other products, like GitLab, that we are currently intensely using at the company."
"Its integration with Bitbucket, Confluence, and other things is most valuable."
"The most valuable feature is code coverage."
"It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."
"Jira could be more, for example, like Micro Focus, which is what I mostly work with currently."
"I would like to see test execution modules."
"The sprint-related graphics need to be improved."
"Jira has recently updated their UI, but more can be done to make it even better."
"Nowadays, many organizations are moving toward the Objectives and Key Results (OKR) framework, and this is something that Jira should be able to accommodate."
"The tool should improve its pricing."
"It is not intuitive."
"The solution needs more integrations with Azure DevOps OnPrem."
"The solution's speed has room for improvement."
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."
Jira is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 266 reviews while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 15th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 4 reviews. Jira is rated 8.2, while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM, whereas Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer. See our Jira vs. Parasoft Development Testing Platform report.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.