We performed a comparison between Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points and Ubiquiti WLAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The AI capabilities of Mist Wireless are superior to other OEMs."
"You can easily monitor, manage, and cover all your IT equipment."
"The simplicity is great."
"Juniper Mist offers valuable features like comprehensive network insight, granular policy control, fast device setup, strong security, and efficient SSL traffic management."
"Overall, we've been very pleased with the performance."
"The solution is stable."
"The solution is very secure."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist is the Virtual Network Assistant, powered by artificial intelligence."
"Firstly, I initially purchased the device to build a VPN, and one very valuable feature for me was the ability to create a layer two VPN, which was available on the legacy ER router. It allowed me to expand a subnet to a remote site, which was essential for my setup. Additionally, I appreciated that the CLI of the router was similar to other Juniper products that I was familiar with."
"The most valuable feature is the level of security on the Wi-Fi network."
"Great management interface."
"The product is simple to use in terms of GUI and dashboard."
"The most beneficial thing about Ubiquiti is that it is simple to deploy."
"The solution is very easy to install."
"You can save backups of this controller locally and then I can export it to wherever I want."
"Its most valuable feature is pricing."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"The solution is expensive."
"I need a bit more time with it before criticizing the features."
"The price could be better."
"Enrolling into the tool is a tedious process."
"The pricing should be made cheaper."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"Juniper Wireless AP can improve by continually improving its reporting and integration with other systems."
"The solution should include and expand on a central management system."
"The logs are not detailed enough. You can't clearly see what is being blocked in Ubiquiti WLAN, making the troubleshooting process a little bit harder."
"The strength of the signal from the access points could be improved."
"The support needs improvement. The official support is kind of complex. It's not that straightforward compared to Cisco and Aruba."
"The product must provide better warranties."
"Ubiquiti WLAN would be improved with the addition of individual AP configuration, which would allow for fine-tuning of individual access points and logins."
"The coverage could be increased."
"There seems to be a drop in service. It's definitely a reliability or stability issue we face."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is ranked 10th in Wireless LAN with 16 reviews while Ubiquiti WLAN is ranked 5th in Wireless LAN with 36 reviews. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is rated 8.8, while Ubiquiti WLAN is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points writes "Offers good performance, good solution and smooth implementation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti WLAN writes "Helps to build VPNs but improvement is needed in stability ". Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is most compared with Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Aruba Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Cisco Wireless and Mist AI and Cloud, whereas Ubiquiti WLAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Ruckus Wireless, Huawei Wireless and WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi. See our Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points vs. Ubiquiti WLAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.